Comparison of Software-assisted Implantation of Elastic Spine Pad (TM) With Respect to Postoperative Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) With the Conventional Disc Spacer Squale (TM) After Anterior Cervical Discectomy for Cervical Disc Prolapse

NCT02936765 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 52

Last updated 2016-10-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is an investigator-initiated study. The primary goal is to evaluate the efficacy of two different cervical disc devices (prosthesis vs rigid spacer) with respect to postoperative change in neck disability index. The evaluation will include clinical and radiological parameters.

Conditions

  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement

Interventions

DEVICE

Anterior cervical discectomy with prosthetic disc replacement / ESP.

Anterior cervical discectomy, with the use of the ESP prosthesis (Manufacturer: FH orthopedics, Mulhouse, France) for the disc replacement.

DEVICE

Anterior cervical discectomy with prosthetic disc replacement / Squale.

Anterior cervical discectomy, with the use of the Squale spacer (Manufacturer: OSD, Avignon, France) for the disc replacement.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Technische Universität Dresden

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-06-30
Primary Completion
2018-12-31
Completion
2019-06-30

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02936765 on ClinicalTrials.gov