A Comparison Study Between Contrast Spread and Loss of Resistance Techniques
NCT05260294 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 45
Last updated 2022-03-02
Summary
Early epidural space identification is critical to the efficacy and safety of cervical epidural steroid injections (CESI) \[1\]. Currently, the accepted method for epidural space recognition is the loss of resistance technique (LORT). I perform CESIs with fluoroscopy only \[2\]. I hypothesized that the contrast spread technique (CST) might recognize epidural space concurrently with or sooner than LORT. I also suggested that smaller needles might be employed with CST but not with LORT. To test my hypotheses, I conducted a comparison study.
Conditions
- Cervical Radiculopathy
- Neck Pain
- Disc Prolapse With Radiculopathy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Epidural space identification with cervical epidural steroid injection employing CST and LORT.
Cervical epidural procedure and epidural space recognition were performed utilizing the fluoroscopy only method. With this technique, needle navigation from the skin toward the epidural space is performed under contralateral oblique fluoroscopy. With the needle at the ventral interlaminar line, the contrast spread technique was employed for epidural space identification. After radiological confirmation of the epidural spread, LOR was tested using an Epidrum® device (Exmoor Innovations Ltd., Somerset, UK). Subsequently, accompanied by the radiology assistant, I observed the Epidrum for 30 seconds or more; if the Epidrum deflated, thus confirming LOR, the result was positive. However, if the device remained inflated, the result was reported as negative. The collected data was then analyzed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Yakov Perper, MD
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-08-19
- Primary Completion
- 2019-10-08
- Completion
- 2019-10-08
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Minimal Invasive Surgery Versus Interlaminar Decompression in Lumbar Canal Stenosis
NCT05147064 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of CompuFlo® Technology in Thoracic Epidural Space Identification
NCT05798754 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Instability in the Lumbar Spine of Patients With Age Related Changes and Narrowing of the Spinal Canal (Spinal Stenosis)
NCT04406987 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Epidural Neuroplasty for the Treatment of Herniated Lumbar Disk
NCT03101033 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between The Results of Open and Microsurgical Decompression in Degenerative Spinal Canal Stenosis in Lumbar Spine
NCT06722859 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Outcomes of Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis
NCT02260401 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Different Approaches During Fluoroscopically Guided Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection
NCT01760317 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Epidural Steroid Injection Versus Epidural Steroid Injection and Manual Physical Therapy and Exercise in the Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT00786981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Decompression Versus Instrumented Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease. Clinical and Biomechanical Outcome Study
NCT06335511 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Does Improvement Towards a Normal Cervical Sagittal Configuration Aid in the Management of Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT05553002 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous HydroDiscectomy Compared to TESI for Radiculopathy
NCT02414698 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Endoscopic Decompression Versus Microscopic Decompression in Lumbar Canal Stenosis
NCT06381167 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy Study Comparing ProDisc-C to ACDF Surgery to Treat SCDD
NCT00291018 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Outcome of Injured Cervical Spinal Cord with Uncontrolled Swelling Under Duraplasty
NCT06552507 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Dispersal Pattern for Spine Injections (Gadolinium Contrast)
NCT02217280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Nucleoplasty vs Percutaneous Nucleotomy vs Decompression Catheter in Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT00300898 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ambulatory Geriatric Endoscopic Spine
NCT06523426 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Antibiotic Protocols in Spine Patients With Postoperative Drains
NCT01608854 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Software-assisted Implantation of Elastic Spine Pad (TM) With Respect to Postoperative Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) With the Conventional Disc Prosthesis Rotaio (TM) After Anterior Cervical Discectomy for Cervical Disc Prolapse
NCT02936739 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Can Minimally Invasive Decompression Surgery Restore Sagittal Balance in a Patient Population With Sagittal Imbalance and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT06075355 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet x Open Microdiskectomy in Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT01367860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03548441 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Indirect vs. Direct Decompression for Treatment of Central Stenosis: RCT
NCT04708977 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Comparison in Cervical Epidural Pressure Changes Between Midline and Paramedian Approaches
NCT01360138 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-organic Signs to Predict Outcomes for Neck Pain
NCT04320836 ·Status: COMPLETED