MedTrace Logo

Cervical Arthroplasty "Fixed Core" Versus "Movable Core": Clinical and Radiological Impact in the Medium Term

NCT02924506 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 37

Last updated 2019-05-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Nowadays, there is no clinical and radiological study comparing two different types of mobile implants in patients requiring surgical treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease. Thus, the choice of the ideal implant remains uncertain.

The goal of this work is to compare the impact of two types of mobile implants in height drives, solicitation facets, positioning and collection of prostheses within the intervertebral spaces.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Mobi-C prothesis

Mobi-C Prothesis, LDR Medical (company)

DEVICE

ProDisc-C prothesis

ProDisc-C prothesis, Vivo Depuy Synthes (company)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Thierry DUFOUR, Ph · CHR d'Orleans

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-02-19
Primary Completion
2016-11-21
Completion
2018-11-30

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02924506 on ClinicalTrials.gov