Burst Abdomen in Emergency Midline Laparotomy: Incidence and Risk
NCT03684902 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 250
Last updated 2018-09-26
Summary
The study was conducted in 250 patients who underwent midline Laparotomy at Kasr Al-Ainy emergency department, Cairo University from August 2017 until March 2018. Factors such as age ,sex, body mass index, substance abuse, previous laparotomy, malignancy, diabetes mellitus , ascites, albumin, renal functions, bilirubin, hemoglobin, intra-abdominal pathology, suture material, creation of stoma, post-operative chest infection, , post-operative paralytic ileus, leakage and wound infection were observed and analyzed with odds ratio and P value
Conditions
- Wound Dehiscence
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
emergency midline exploratory laparotomy
Once an adequate level of anesthesia has been reached, the initial incision into the skin may be made. A scalpel is first used to cut into the superficial layers of the skin.with the diathermy The incision is then continued through the subcutaneous fat, the abdominal muscles, and finally, the peritoneum. (Morris J ;2017) For all the patients, closure of midline laparotomy wound was en-mass closure done with non-absorbable No. 1 (Polypropylene) or slowly absorbable (PDS) (double loop). sutures in continuous single layer fashion with 1 cm interval. (Morris J ;2017) The operative details were recorded with special consideration to the operative diagnosis, presence and types of adhesions, duration of surgery, the need for diversion and stoma formation, the use of intraperitoneal drain and the suture material to close the rectus sheath.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ahmed maged, MD · Professor
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 19 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-08-05
- Primary Completion
- 2018-08-30
- Completion
- 2018-09-20
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Role of Subcutaneous Negative Pressure Suction Drain Placed for Ten Days on Wound Healing in Obese Patients Undergoing Midline Laparotomies
NCT02832076 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Small-bite Versus Conventional Midline Fascial Closure in Abdominal Surgeries
NCT07340918 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Results of Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Application of Clips Versus Ligature for Stump Closure
NCT07115303 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Suture Size in Laparotomy Wound Closure to Prevent Post-operative Complications
NCT05474677 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Drainage Versus Interventional Radiology In Management Of Appendicular Abscess :
NCT05419440 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Versus Interrupted Abdominal Wall Closure After Emergency Midline Laparotomy
NCT00544583 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Irrigation Versus Suction in Complicated Acute Appendicitis
NCT02688244 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation for Intra-abdominal Catastrophes
NCT05208489 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cold Knife Versus Monopolar Electrosurgery in Abdominal Incisions
NCT04236401 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intra-Abdominal Instillation Of Fresh Frozen Plasma Versus Corticosteroids In Prevention Of Recurrent Attacks Of Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction: A 2 Years' Experience Clinical Study
NCT06859307 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Continuous Versus Interrupted Suturing on Wound Dehiscence and Infection After Abdominal Surgery
NCT07241507 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Small Bite Technique Versus Standardised Large Bites Technique in Closure of Midline Laparotomies.
NCT04788875 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Hot Pack Application on Postoperative Ileus Undergoing Surgery for Gynecologic Malignancies
NCT04833699 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Repair of Lateral And Mediolateral Episiotomy
NCT03486132 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Insitu Repair Versus Uterine Exeriorization During Cesarean Section
NCT01723605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Modified Burch Colposuspension
NCT05616481 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Clipping Versus Extracorporeal Ligation in Complicated Appendicitis Upper Egypt Overview
NCT05637554 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Closure vs Non Closure of Rectus Muscle at Cesarean Section 5 Year Study
NCT04548570 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Closure of Appendicular Stump
NCT07229690 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between Vacuum Drain and Passive Drain In Abdominoplasty
NCT06486298 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prevention of Fascial Dehiscence With Prophylactic Onlay Mesh in Emergency Laparotomies
NCT03293862 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prevention of Postoperative Ventral Hernias
NCT04562363 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Conservative Versus Operative Management in Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction
NCT06870864 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Umblical Incision for Neonatal Surgery
NCT03256669 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Incisional Hernia in Infants and Children
NCT05005663 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA