Comparison of the Malposition Rates of the Vertebral Pedicle Screws Using the PediGuard Technique: PediGuard Technique Associated With Fluoroscopy and Fluoroscopy Alone
NCT02826499 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2017-07-28
Summary
Pedicular screwing has become the gold standard for intervertebral fixation required in degenerative, scoliotic, tumoral pathologies or for fractures. Several pedicular screwing methods exist.
The free hand pedicular screwing requires a high learning curve and has, as a consequence, a high malposition rate.
The placing of pedicular screws under fluoroscopic control is the most common technique as it is both reproducible and accessible. It is a two dimensional imaging technique. The profile incidence at the level of the spine is mostly used to spot the vertebral pedicle and the direction of the screw in the sagittal plane. However, there is no real control of the direction of the pedicular screw in the horizontal or frontal plane. The screw malposition rate is less important than with the 'free hand' technique but remains none of the less significant. Furthermore, fluoroscopy is an irradiating imaging technique, both for the patient and the staff.
New revolutionary techniques as the tridimensional navigation and the per-operatory tomodensitometry appeared in the last few years. The techniques give the best results when used concommitantly. The material has the advantage of being very precise. The pedicular screw malposition rate is minimal after a three-dimensional localisation. However, those systems require qualified staff and expose the patient and the nursing team to high radiation levels. The costs are higher and the surgery duration is globally longer. It is thus difficult to implement this technique in each belgian hospital.
Finally, the Pediguard technique appeared on the market. It is a guide for the perforation of the pedicular channel, with a probe at its extremity. This probe allows a real time measurement of the electric conductivity of the tissues that are being crossed. The conductivity measure is translated in a sound signal. Because the cortical bone has a low conductivity, the probe will emit a low intensity sound signal. The cancellous bone has a medium conductivity. Therefore, the probe will emit a medium sound signal. However, in the event of a breach in the pedicular cortical, as blood and periost have a high conductibility, the probe will emit a intense, rapid pace, sound signal.The Pediguard technique helps thus to anticipate a cortical effraction, by detecting the proximity of the cortical wall. It is efficient but remains relatively expensive.
The main objective of this study is to determine the precision of the placing of pedicular screws, with and without Pediguard system, under fluoroscopy.
Conditions
- Pedicular Screwing
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Pediguard
It is a guide for the perforation of the pedicular channel, with a probe at its extremity. This probe allows a real time measurement of the electric conductivity of the tissues that are being crossed. The conductivity measure is translated in a sound signal. Because the cortical bone has a low conductivity, the probe will emit a low intensity sound signal. The cancellous bone has a medium conductivity. Therefore, the probe will emit a medium sound signal. However, in the event of a breach in the pedicular cortical, as blood and periost have a high conductibility, the probe will emit a intense, rapid pace, sound signal.The Pediguard technique helps thus to anticipate a cortical effraction, by detecting the proximity of the cortical wall.
- OTHER
-
Fluoroscopy
The placing of pedicular screws under fluoroscopic control is the most common technique as it is both reproducible and accessible. It is a two dimensional imaging technique. The profile incidence at the level of the spine is mostly used to spot the vertebral pedicle and the direction of the screw in the sagittal plane. However, there is no real control of the direction of the pedicular screw in the horizontal or frontal plane and it is an irradiating imaging technique.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Brugmann University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Tamas Illes, MD · CHU Brugmann
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-07-31
- Completion
- 2017-07-31
Countries
- Belgium
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
OsseoScrew Versus Fenestrated Pedicle Screws Augmented With Polymethylmethacrylate
NCT01613144 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Treatment of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: Percutaneously Placed Pedicle Screws Versus Open Treatment
NCT02146729 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Detecting Malposition of Trans-pedicle Screw From AP and LAT Plain Radiographs
NCT04784923 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus in Trimalleolar AO Weber C Fractures.
NCT02599285 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Tripod-Fix Vertebral Body Augmentation System in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Treatment
NCT06261242 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Short Segment Fixation in Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Fracture
NCT02719340 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Early Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Standard Conservative Treatment in Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures
NCT03617094 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Retrospective Comparison Between CPS and HC Techniques for Osteoporotic Fractures in the Thoracic or Lumbar Spine
NCT05130242 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Surgical Treatment of the Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures.
NCT03316703 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Screw Fixation vs. Open Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures
NCT04495400 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Antegrade and Retrograde Fixation With Intramedullary Screws in Metacarpal Fractures
NCT06920823 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Treated With Pedicle Screws: Radiographic Outcomes
NCT01979198 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pediatric Hip Plate Versus Cannulated Screw in Pediatric Femoral Neck Fracture
NCT02803983 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Single Trans-sacral Screw Versus Two Iliosacral Screws
NCT03944174 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Safety and Efficacy of the ISS Sleeve Augmentation Technique in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Osteopenic Fractures
NCT04495439 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Cement Augmented Transpedicular Screw Fixation Versus Cannulated Screws Fixation in Osteoporotic Spine
NCT07294417 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Antegrade Screw Placement Technique in Anterior Column of Acetabulum
NCT06634251 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Digital Three-dimensional Imaging Models for Repair of Complex Long Bone Fractures
NCT02964754 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Identification of Microcirculation and Inflammation After Posterior Stabilization of the Spine
NCT01266200 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spinopelvic Fixation for Unstable Sacral Fractures
NCT06755580 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Fixation Methods of Basicervical Fractures
NCT04240743 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dynamic Versus Static Lag Screw Modes for Cephalomedullary Nails Used to Fix Intertrochanteric Fragility Fractures
NCT04441723 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Short Segment vs Long Segment Fixation in Traumatic Dorsolumbar Spine Fractures
NCT03272243 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Application of 3-Dimensional Printing Guide Template and Pointed Lotus-style Regulator
NCT04980131 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Operative vs Non-Operative Treatment of Sacral Fractures
NCT04044300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA