MedTrace Logo

A Retrospective Comparison Between CPS and HC Techniques for Osteoporotic Fractures in the Thoracic or Lumbar Spine

NCT05130242 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2021-11-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Cement-augmented pedicle screws (CPS) and hybrid construct (HC) consisting of pedicle screws and additional hooks are common methods in osteoporotic fracture of the thoracic and lumbar spine. No study has compared the surgical results between CPS and HC techniques for treatment of the osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar spine fracture. The aim of the retrospective study was to compare surgical results using CPS or HC for osteoporotic fractures in the thoracic or lumbar spine. Patients who received surgical treatment with CPS or HC for osteoporotic fractures in the thoracic or lumbar spine.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Cement-augmented Pedicle Screws (CPS)

Patients who received surgical treatment with CPS for osteoporotic fractures in the thoracic or lumbar spine

PROCEDURE

Hybrid Construct (HC)

Patients who received surgical treatment with HC consisting of pedicle screws and additional hooks for osteoporotic fractures in the thoracic or lumbar spine

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

    lead OTHER_GOV

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-01-21
Primary Completion
2022-01-21
Completion
2022-01-21

Countries

  • Taiwan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05130242 on ClinicalTrials.gov