Surgical Treatment of the Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures.
NCT03316703 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2021-10-06
Summary
The thoracolumbar segment fractures are the most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated in unstable fractures. Surgical treatment has been performed through the posterior fixation pedicle fixation systems, and where necessary complemented by decompression of the spinal arthrodesis and previous channel. Surgical treatment has been performed by conventional open approach through the posterior incision on the midline, and detachment and removal of paraspinal muscles to access the posterior vertebral elements. The percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced in the context of spinal surgery to reduce the morbidity associated with conventional open approach. It has been reported the lowest bleeding intra- and postoperative period, less pain, shorter hospital stay, rehabilitation and return to work faster with less use of minimally invasive percutaneous approach of the spine. However, predominates in the literature of clinical case reports and few prospective and randomized clinical trials. The performance of prospective randomized clinical trials have been required for the evaluation of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of the thoracolumbar spine fractures. The objective of the study is to compare the surgical treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine using the conventional open approach or minimally invasive percutaneous approach to the stabilization of the vertebral segment affected, and using similar type of pedicle spinal fixation system. Patients will be evaluated in the preoperative, postoperative, 1,2,3,6,12 and 24 months by parameters related to the perioperative (intraoperative bleeding, surgery time), clinical (VAS, SF-36, HADS, EQ-5D-5L), images (radiographs and computed tomography). The study results will impact the guidelines of the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures and may indicate the advantages or disadvantages of using surgery through conventional open approach to minimally invasive percutaneous surgery.
Conditions
- Spinal Fracture
- Traumatic Fracture
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional open surgery
Surgical treatment will be performed by stabilizing the fractured vertebral segment (proximal vertebra and vertebra distal to fractured vertebra and fractured vertebra) by means of a 6.5 mm or 6.5 mm diameter polyaxial pedicle screw system. In the fractured proximal and distal vertebrae to the vertebrae, screws will be used up to the vertebral body and fractured vertebra will use shorter screws that do not penetrate the vertebral body. In the fractured vertebra, single or bilateral pedicle screw will be used according to the degree of involvement of the pedicle of the fractured vertebra. The vertebral fixation system will be applied through the conventional open approach (group A).
- PROCEDURE
-
Minimally invasive percutaneous surgery
Surgical treatment will be performed by stabilizing the fractured vertebral segment (proximal vertebra and vertebra distal to fractured vertebra and fractured vertebra) by means of a 6.5 mm or 6.5 mm diameter polyaxial pedicle screw system. In the fractured proximal and distal vertebrae to the vertebrae, screws will be used up to the vertebral body and fractured vertebra will use shorter screws that do not penetrate the vertebral body. In the fractured vertebra, single or bilateral pedicle screw will be used according to the degree of involvement of the pedicle of the fractured vertebra. The vertebral fixation system will be applied through the minimally invasive percutaneous approach (group B) according to allocation after randomization.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Sao Paulo
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Helton LA Defino, MD, PhD. · Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology.University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-05-09
- Primary Completion
- 2021-12-10
- Completion
- 2023-12-01
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spinopelvic Fixation for Unstable Sacral Fractures
NCT06755580 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Spine FA3 - a Prospective, International, Multicenter Cohort Study on Treatment of of AO A3 Thoracolumbar Fractures
NCT01751633 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
ORthosis vs No Orthosis After Surgically Treated Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures
NCT03097081 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Screw Fixation vs. Open Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures
NCT04495400 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Posterior Fixation Alone and Combined With Articular Process Fusion in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures
NCT01864785 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Modified Placement of Two Additional Pedicle Screws at the Fracture Level for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures--a Study Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT03384368 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Conservative vs Surgical Treatment for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly
NCT02913378 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Study Comparing Surgical Versus Non-surgical Treatment
NCT02827214 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Randomized Trial With an Observational Component of Non-operative Versus Operative Treatment for AO Type A3 Fractures
NCT02179697 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Survival After Surgical Treatment of Axis Fractures in Elderly
NCT02839057 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Thoracolumbar Burstfractures, Orthesis or No Orthesis
NCT02784782 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Lumbopelvic Fixation Versus Novel Adjustable Plate for Displaced Sacral Fracture
NCT03647410 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Operative vs Non-Operative Treatment of Sacral Fractures
NCT04044300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Reduction and Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures
NCT01810094 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
CT Guided Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Vertebral Non-union Following Posterior Fixation
NCT05071625 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Outcome of Implant Removal Versus Retention After Posterior Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures
NCT04597567 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Early Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Standard Conservative Treatment in Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures
NCT03617094 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Short Segment vs Long Segment Fixation in Traumatic Dorsolumbar Spine Fractures
NCT03272243 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Above-versus Below-elbow Casting for Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures
NCT03126175 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mangement of Spine Fracture
NCT06458309 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cut-out of the Cervical Screw on Pertrochanteric Fractures
NCT04175548 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Early Mobilization of Spiral Metacarpal Fractures Compared With Operative Treatment
NCT03067454 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Incidence and Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral and Tibial Fractures
NCT03148067 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Platelet-rich Plasma Combined With Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Atrophic Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fractures
NCT03129971 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Syndactyly Versus Closed Reduction in 5th Metacarpal Neck Fracture
NCT03434587 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA