Clinical Evaluation of Single-stage Advanced Versus Rotated Flaps in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT02433912 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 36
Last updated 2015-05-05
Summary
BACKGROUND: Several procedures have been reported for the surgical correction of gingival recession (GR), including the laterally positioned flap (LPF) and the coronally advanced flap (CAF), performed as single or two-stage procedures without or with, respectively, the preceding placement and healing of a free gingival graft (FGG). The objective of the present report was to compare the efficacy of single-stage LPF and CAF techniques in the treatment of localized maxillary GR defects.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients with Miller class I GR defects were randomly assigned to be treated by either a CAF (n=18) or LPF (n=18). Clinical parameters, including recession height (RECH), the width of keratinized tissue (WKT), probing depth (PD) and vertical clinical attachment level (VAL) were assessed at the mid-buccal site. Visual plaque score (VPS) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were also assessed dichotomously. Clinical recordings were performed at baseline, 6 months and 5 years later. Inter-measurements differences were analyzed with a Chi-square or a Wilcoxon test, with significance set at α\<0.05.
Conditions
- Gingival Recession
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Test - Laterally positioned flap
Laterally positioned flap. Systemic analgesics consisting of 750 mg of paracetamol was taken every six hours for four days. chlorhexidine gluconate (2.0%) gel applied in saturated cotton swabs twice a day for 14 days.
- PROCEDURE
-
Control-Coronally positioned flap
Coronally positioned flap. Systemic analgesics consisting of 750 mg of paracetamol was taken every six hours for four days. chlorhexidine gluconate (2.0%) gel applied in saturated cotton swabs twice a day for 14 days.
- DRUG
-
750 mg paracetamol
Systemic analgesics consisting of 750 mg of paracetamol was taken every six hours for four days
- DRUG
-
chlorhexidine gluconate
chlorhexidine gluconate (2.0%) gel applied in saturated cotton swabs twice a day for 14 days
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universidade Federal Fluminense
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ronaldo B Santana, DDS,MScD,DSc · Federal Fluminense University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2002-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2011-12-31
- Completion
- 2011-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Microsurgical Versus Conventional Semilunar Coronally Advanced Flap
NCT02433899 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Platelet-rich Fibrin and Connective Tissue Graft in Recession Treatment
NCT02397122 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Flaps for Root Coverage
NCT02814279 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Growth Factors in the Localized Gingival Recessions Treatment
NCT05188768 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recombinant Human Platelet-derived Growth Factor in Combination With Collagen Matrix
NCT04462237 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Concentrated Growth Factor in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT02385734 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Laterally Closed Tunnel Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined With Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Isolated RT2 Gingival Recession
NCT05823415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02818855 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Growth Factors in the Treatment of the Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05319938 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AUTOLOGOUS FIBRIN GLUE VERSES 4-0 SILK SUTURES IN PERIODONTAL FLAP CLOSURE
NCT03792113 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Periosteal Pedicle Flap Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Management of Gingival Recession
NCT06529640 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
L-PRF Versus Connective Tissue Graft Associated to Coronally Advanced Flap in Gingival Recession Treatment
NCT04165044 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Gingival Recession With Tunnel Technique Using Connective Tissue Graft and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin
NCT06646432 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Miller Class I and II Gingival Recession Using Non- Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Graft as Compared to Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft
NCT03543163 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin With Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Deep Gingival Recession Defects.
NCT04032405 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison Between Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT01175720 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Using Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft Compared to Connective Tissue Graft in Management of Miller Class I and II Gingival Recession.
NCT03213483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CGF and PRF in the Gingival Recessions Treatment
NCT04261634 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap v.s Coronally Advanced Flap With Graft for Gingival Recession
NCT06553677 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Platelet-rich Fibrin for Revascularization of Immature Permanent Teeth Versus Standard Apexification
NCT06693349 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Composite Resin Plus Connective Tissue Graft.
NCT02423473 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Semilunar and Conventional Coronally Positioned Flap for the Treatment Gingival Recession
NCT03391947 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Platelet Rich Fibrin in the Treatment of Palatal Wounds
NCT02438046 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effectiveness of the Papillary Extended Connective Tissue Graft in Miller Class III Gingival Recession
NCT03416673 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of I-PRF After Gingivectomy
NCT07174934 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA