MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Two Oral Appliances in the Treatment of Sleep Apnea Syndrome

NCT02763813 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 4

Last updated 2016-10-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Monocentric comparative group study comparing the efficacy and short-term tolerance of a propulsion type oral appliance (Herbst) with a retention type device (ORM) used in the treatment of sleep apnea syndrome. The investigators hypothesized both appliances would be equally effective and tolerated.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Herbst (propulsion type oral appliance)

Oral appliance

DEVICE

Retention type appliance (ORM)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hopital Foch

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Marc BLUMEN, MD · Hôpital FOCH 40, rue Worth 92150 Suresnes

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-05-31
Primary Completion
2012-12-31
Completion
2013-02-28

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02763813 on ClinicalTrials.gov