MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Nasal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Valve to Dental Device as an Alternative Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

NCT01553383 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2013-04-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Determine the clinical efficacy in terms of Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), nocturnal oxygenation of a nasal Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) valve "Provent" in obstructive sleep apnea. The hypothesis is the efficacy will be better than dental device.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

nasal peep valve "Provent"

application of nasal peep valve vs dental device and cpap

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Chinese University of Hong Kong

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-02-29
Primary Completion
2013-03-31
Completion
2013-03-31

Countries

  • Hong Kong

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01553383 on ClinicalTrials.gov