Comparison of Breathing Event Detection by a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Device to Clinical Polysomnography

NCT01175031 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 45

Last updated 2018-10-31

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate diagnostic agreement and determine the accuracy of the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device compared to simultaneous, attended clinical polysomnography (PSG) in identifying breathing events in participants previously diagnosed with complex sleep apnea (CompSAS), complex sleep apnea with Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR), or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

Manipulation of Positive Airway Pressure (PAP)

Positive airway pressure (PAP) will be manipulated throughout the night to induce breathing events. PAP will be set to the participant's prescribed pressure, increased until breathing events are induced , and then returned to the prescribed pressure. This cyclic pattern will continue throughout the night.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Philips Respironics

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Richard Berry, MD · University of Florida

  • Sheila Tsai, MD · National Jewish Health

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-09-30
Primary Completion
2013-06-30
Completion
2013-09-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01175031 on ClinicalTrials.gov