MedTrace Logo

A Comparison of Controlled Ventilation With the V60 Non-Invasive Ventilator vs. Traditional Mask Ventilation

NCT02623270 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE1 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2016-08-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an experienced anesthesia provider can adequately and/or easily mask ventilate an anesthetized patient with a commercial non-invasive ventilator device.

Conditions

  • Respiratory Complications Due to Anesthesia

Interventions

DEVICE

Noninvasive Ventilator, V60 (Philips)

The noninvasive ventilator will be set to deliver 10 breaths per minute with a pressure setting of 8 cm H2O during exhalation and 20 cm H2O during inspiration. The inspired oxygen fraction given by the ventilator will be set at the maximum level (100% oxygen).

DEVICE

Manual Bag

Oxygen will flow through the standard breathing circuit with the fresh gas flow rate set at 10 L/min and the patient will be ventilated. The anesthesia provider will manually bag mask ventilate the patient until the anesthesiologist feels comfortable that the patient can be ventilated appropriately.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

    collaborator FED

  • University of Utah

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kai Kuck, Ph.D. · University of Utah

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
74 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-07-31
Primary Completion
2016-05-31
Completion
2016-08-31

More Related Trials

Entities

Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02623270 on ClinicalTrials.gov