MedTrace Logo

Nasopharyngeal Versus Nasal Cannula Oxygen Supplementation in Surgery Patients

NCT02219464 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2017-06-01

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The investigators plan to conduct a randomized, controlled trial comparing nasopharyngeal oxygen supplementation to traditional nasal cannula in patients undergoing oral surgery under moderate sedation.

Conditions

  • Oxygen Administration During Deep Sedation

Interventions

DEVICE

Nasopharyngeal catheter

DEVICE

Nasal Cannula

PROCEDURE

Oxygen Supplementation

Initially set at 3 liters/minute

PROCEDURE

Sedation

Midazolam 2mg IV, Fentanyl 100mcg IV, Propofol 100 mcg/kg/min. Additional doses of propofol at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Vanderbilt University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Bret Alvis, MD · Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-08-31
Primary Completion
2015-12-31
Completion
2016-01-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02219464 on ClinicalTrials.gov