Comparision of Blood Pressure Variability Between Amlodipine and Losartan
NCT01964079 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 144
Last updated 2017-05-12
Summary
Blood pressure (BP) is believed to be a major determinant of vascular disease, and BP lowering is the most important goal in hypertension treatment. Thus, clinical guidelines for hypertension are mainly focused on lowering mean BP. However, despite an increasing incidence of stroke with age, the association between systolic BP (SBP) and the risk of stroke decreases with age. This disparity highlights a gap in the link between BP and vascular-related diseases (i.e., stroke). In clinical practice, visit-to-visit fluctuations in BP have been largely ignored and are thought to be an unreliable finding, even though this phenomenon is frequently observed. Rothwell et al. demonstrated that the visit-to-visit variability in SBP was a more powerful independent predictor of stroke than mean SBP, and that an increased residual variability in SBP in treated hypertensive patients was also a strong predictor of stroke and coronary events.
Recently updated (2011) hypertension guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) \[or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)\] and calcium-channel blocker (CCB) as a first line drug. Although the significance of BP variability (BPV) has been illustrated, the main focus of the current guidelines is to reduce systolic and diastolic BP, not BPV.
In the X-CELLENT study, a CCB (amlodipine) and thiazide-like diuretic drug (indapamide sustained-release) led to a significant reduction in BPV, compared to an ARB (candesartan). In addition, the CCB showed the most effective reduction in systolic BPV among the antihypertensive drug class in a meta-analysis. However, there are no direct comparison studies of a CCB and ARB on BPV. Thus, we aim to compare the systolic BPV effects of a CCB versus an ARB in essential hypertensive patients. The primary hypothesis is that an ARB is not inferior to a CCB in the reduction of the systolic BPV standard deviation (SD) in essential hypertensive patients.
Conditions
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Amlodipine
Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either an amlodipine or a losartan group by a computer-generated random number table. For patients who fail to respond to 5 mg amlodipine, the dose will be titrated up to 10 mg amlodipine. At subsequent visits, additional antihypertensive therapy (hydrochlorothiazide) will be added if systolic (\>140 mmHg) or diastolic (\>90 mmHg) BP is inadequate. Study drugs are administered once a day for 24 weeks. The dose will be titrated up if SBP is over 90 mmHg or there are no symptoms of hypotension (syncope, loss of consciousness, or orthostatic hypotension). If up-titration is not tolerable, because of side effects or hypotension, the previous dose will be administered as the final tolerable dose.
- DRUG
-
Losartan
Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either an amlodipine or a losartan group by a computer-generated random number table. For patients who fail to respond to 50 mg losartan, the dose will be titrated up to 100 mg losartan. At subsequent visits, additional antihypertensive therapy (hydrochlorothiazide) will be added if systolic (\>140 mmHg) or diastolic (\>90 mmHg) BP is inadequate. Study drugs are administered once a day for 24 weeks. The dose will be titrated up if SBP is over 90 mmHg or there are no symptoms of hypotension (syncope, loss of consciousness, or orthostatic hypotension). If up-titration is not tolerable, because of side effects or hypotension, the previous dose will be administered as the final tolerable dose.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator INDUSTRY
-
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Byung-Su Yoo, MD, PhD · Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 79 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2017-04-30
- Completion
- 2017-05-31
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of the Fixed Dose Combination Amlodipine/Valsartan on Central Aortic Blood Pressure in Uncontrolled Essential Hypertension With Amlodipine 5 mg
NCT00687973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Effects Between Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide in Combination With Losartan on 24-hr Central Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients
NCT02294539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Safety of Amlodipine and Losartan in Patients With Essential Hypertension
NCT00942344 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Effect of Losartan Versus Amlodipine-based Therapy in Ischemic Stroke (0954-338)(COMPLETED)
NCT00754429 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Safety Study of S-Amlodipine Gentisate Compared to Amlodipine Besylate to Treat Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension
NCT00289406 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Study of Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696/Amlodipine in Grade 1 and 2 Hypertension Patients Uncontrolled by LCZ696 Monotherapy
NCT06236061 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Hydrochlorothiazide (+) Losartan Potassium vs. Amlodipine Comparative Study (0954A-314)
NCT00157963 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy/Safety of Amlodipine Plus Losartan Versus Amlodipine in Patients With Stage 2 Hypertension
NCT01127217 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Phase 2 Study to Assess Dose-response Relationship of HCP1803 in Patients With Essential Hypertension
NCT03897868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effect of Lacidipine and Losartan on 24 Hour Systolic Blood Pressure Variability in Elderly Hypertensive Patients
NCT00533858 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Amlodipine and Losartan
NCT03912285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan and Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension
NCT00425373 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Study of the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Alone and in Combination With Amlodipine in Patients With Hypertension
NCT01865188 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Hypertension Control Based on Home Blood Pressure
NCT00198562 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Losartan and HCTZ and Amlodipine vs Atenolol and Amlodipine (0954A-309)(COMPLETED)
NCT00140959 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Effects of Moderate vs. Aggressive Treatment With Valsartan + Amlodipine on Patients With Hypertension Uncontrolled by Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker (Herein, ARB) Monotherapy
NCT00666536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Losartan/Amlodipine on Hemodynamics Parameters and Arterial Stiffness in Arterial Hypertension
NCT03626259 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
S-amlodipine in Essential HypertensIon and Assessment of Blood Pressure Targets Achievement
NCT06130124 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Irbesartan/Amlodipine in Hypertensive Patients Uncontrolled on Amlodipine 5 mg Monotherapy
NCT00956644 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
To Demonstrate Non-inferiority of Combination of 5 mg Amlodipine/ 80 mg Valsartan to 160 mg Valsartan Alone
NCT01070043 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Study to Evaluate the Effect on Improvement of LVH by the Control of BP in Hypertension Patients With AV Disease
NCT03666351 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Recurrent Stroke Prevention Clinical Outcome Study
NCT01198496 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy of Losartan + Amlodipine Compared to Amlodipine Alone in the Treatment of Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure (MK-0954F-399)
NCT01277822 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Antihypertensive Response to Losartan and Genetic Polymorphisms
NCT00617877 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Irbesartan and Amlodipine Combination in Controlling Blood Pressure
NCT00950066 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2