Audit and Feedback for Primary Care: a Cluster-randomized Trial

Summary

In a previous study, the investigators delivered graphs to family physicians that outlined the proportion of patients with a history of diabetes or heart disease achieving evidence-based quality targets derived from guideline recommendations. A qualitative evaluation found that participating family physicians did not act upon the feedback for two main reasons. First, they felt that targets recommended in guidelines often did not apply for particular patients. Second, they complained that had difficulty using the feedback reports that only provided aggregate level data for clinical action. In this cluster-randomized trial, the investigators test two approaches to conducting audit and feedback that aims to address these issues. The investigators hypothesize that feedback identifying a small number of patients at high-risk for cardiovascular events requiring action will more effectively lead to changes in clinical behavior than feedback identifying all patients not reaching optimal care targets.

Conditions

• Diabetes
• Hypertension
• Ischemic Heart Disease

Interventions

OTHER

High risk

Aggregate-level feedback reports focusing on the proportion of patients with hypertension and/or diabetes and/or ischemic heart disease meeting criteria for high-risk sent via courier every six months and available on a password protected website. Family physicians in this arm will also have access through this website to a list of chart numbers identifying those patients at highest risk. Family physicians in Arm 2 are asked to complete a worksheet that also includes goal setting and action planning, but focuses on reducing the number of patients with high-risk criteria and offers some suggested practice-based approaches.

OTHER

Best Practice

Standard, aggregate-level feedback reports focusing on the proportion of patients with hypertension and/or diabetes and/or ischemic heart disease meeting targets sent via courier every six months and available on a password protected website. Family physicians in this arm will also have access through this website to patient-level data to identify patients not achieving optimal quality of care targets. Family physicians in Arm 1 are asked to complete a worksheet that follows continuous quality improvement principles, including setting an aim statement, engagement with team members in the clinic, testing change concepts at first on a small scale, and then scaling up in a effort to spread best practices.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences

  collaborator OTHER

• Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

  collaborator OTHER_GOV

• Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

  collaborator OTHER

• Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

  lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

• Karen Tu, MD MSc · Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Masking

NONE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

18 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2013-06-30

Primary Completion

2014-08-31

Completion

2014-08-31

Countries

• Canada

Study Locations