Single-incision Laparoscopic (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
NCT00997516 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 75
Last updated 2014-08-22
Summary
Recent advances in laparoscopic instrumentation have made it possible to perform intra-abdominal operations entirely through a small incision that can be hidden within the umbilicus. The goal is to perform surgery with fewer incisions and no visible scars. Other potential benefits are faster recovery, less pain, and fewer wound complications. The term SILS (Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery) is being used to describe such techniques, and many have touted SILS as a major breakthrough in minimally-invasive surgery, moving the field closer to surgery that is bloodless, incisionless, and painless. Despite the hype, prospective comparisons of SILS versus conventional laparoscopy are lacking. Results of SILS procedures have generally been limited to case reports and small case series that lack controls. The investigators propose to conduct a prospective, randomized, single-center trial of SILS appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy to treat acute appendicitis. Primary end-points are operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, recovery time, and long-term cosmetic outcome. The investigators hypothesize SILS appendectomy is equivalent to laparoscopic appendectomy with respect to operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, and recovery time while providing a better cosmetic outcome.
Conditions
- Appendicitis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
SILS appendectomy
Use of SILSPort to perform laparoscopic appendectomy
- PROCEDURE
-
conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
conventional laparoscopic removal of the appendix
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Medtronic - MITG
collaborator INDUSTRY -
University of California, San Francisco
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jonathan T. Carter, M.D. · UCSF Department of Surgery
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2012-12-31
- Completion
- 2014-01-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT01515293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Preserving or Resecting the Normal Appendix in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopy Surgery for Suspected Appendicitis
NCT06917612 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Open to Laparoscopic Reverse Conversion of Perforated Appendicitis
NCT05283733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
NCT04618666 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery in the Treatment of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction
NCT01867528 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy? Let the Patient Decide
NCT01738750 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy Prospective Randomized Control Study
NCT05611489 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy Study of Single Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis
NCT01007318 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery in Acute Abdomen
NCT03198065 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Adhesiolysis in Chronic Abdominal Pain
NCT01245023 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial on Postoperative Outcomes According to the Number of Trocar During Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT00816933 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT01424631 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Proficiency-based Versus Free Laparoscopic Training in Cholecystectomy on a Virtual Reality Simulator
NCT01615549 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT06177418 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Non Absorbable Clips vs Endoloops in Laproscopic Appendicectomy
NCT04094480 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Intraperitoneal Drain Placement on Postoperative Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Adult Patients With Perforated Appendicitis
NCT06927765 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Antibiotic Therapy vs Laparscopic Appendectomy in Pediatric Chronic Appendicitis
NCT03754387 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Technical Modifications of Appendicular Stump Closure During Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT03750032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial on Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single Port Appendectomy
NCT01348464 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation the Role of Laparoscopic Management of Perforated Appendicitis
NCT03267082 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Initial Versus Delayed Operation for Treatment of Complicated Appendicitis In Children
NCT00540189 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Assisted or Total Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT02673528 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Appendectomy in Children Performed by Residents in the Era of Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01657565 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transrectal NOTES Appendectomy - Feasibility Study
NCT01189916 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Approach in Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction
NCT06799208 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING