Comparison of Two Different Membranes
NCT01808794 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 27
Last updated 2020-02-19
Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare one material called "Mucograft" with another material called "Dynamatrix." These materials are used as a type of a barrier (made from pig material also known as porcine material) in a preservation technique to increase the thickness and width of tissues at a tooth extraction site. The investigators want to see if one works better than the other or if they work equally as well. These materials are made up of collagens, which are naturally occurring proteins found in the skin, specifically connective tissue. Dynamatrix is made up of many types of collagens whereas Mucograft is only made of fewer collagens. These materials have been given something called a 510(k) status by the FDA. This means that the FDA determines them to be equivalent to another product that they have previously approved. You will be put into one of two groups at random, and will not know which one you are in. Like flipping a coin, you will have a 50/50 chance to be in either one of the two groups. You will either be in a group using Mucograft or in a group using Dynamatrix. Both of these materials are regularly used in the dental clinics.
Conditions
- Partial Edentulism
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Mucograft
Mucograft Collagen Matrix
- DEVICE
-
Dynamatrix
Dynamatrix
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Tufts University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
James Hanley, DMD · TUSDM
-
Youngsoo Kim, DDS · TUSDM
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-01-31
- Completion
- 2016-01-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
An RCT Comparing Xenograft and Allograft for Ridge Preservation
NCT02330523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
OsteoGen Plug vs. Freeze-dried Bone Allograft With Collagen Barrier
NCT06447844 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Collagen Matrix + rhPDGF-BB vs Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dehiscences
NCT05576922 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Augmentation Techniques in Extraction Sockets
NCT01836783 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation Comparing 2 Membranes
NCT01905280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Types of Bone Grafts in Patients Who Need One of Their Front Teeth Removed and Replaced With an Implant
NCT06722482 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Porcine Membrane vs Bovine Wound Dressing in Human Tooth Extraction Sites
NCT05802602 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Preservation: A Clinical and Histological Study
NCT03422692 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Implant Stability in Autogenous Mineralized and Demineralized Dentin Grafts
NCT05219305 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Sinus Augmentation Bone Healing Using Autograft and Xenograft Compared to Xenograft Alone
NCT06247098 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Platelet-rich Fibrin (PRF) Membranes in Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation When Jaw Bone is Missing Before Dental Implant Installation. A Study Comparing an Autogenous Bone Block Graft Covered Either by a (PRF) Membrane (Test) or Bone Substitute and a Barrier Membrane (Control)
NCT04350749 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge Versus Collagen Matrix in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05423535 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Amnion Chorion Membrane vs. Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane in Ridge Preservation Procedures
NCT02602223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Ridge Preservation With Putty Allografts
NCT03956251 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of a Synthetic Bone Substitute for Ridge Preservation
NCT02894528 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mix of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral: a Possible Solution for Alveolar Ridge Preservation?
NCT06275789 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Clinical Study Between a Collagen Matrix and Collagen Membrane as Wound Protection During Ridge Preservation ARP
NCT06029322 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction in the Posterior Maxilla
NCT02952209 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Following Tooth Extraction Using Bovine Xenograft With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane
NCT05791123 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biomaterial to Counteract Ridge Reduction Following the Removal of Multiple Adjacent Teeth.
NCT02903667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy of Collagen Sponge Versus Collagen Membrane on Ridge Preservation of Periodontally Compromised Teeth
NCT05188196 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Putty Allograft vs. Putty Alloplast Graft
NCT05484492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Volumetric Analysis of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing for Ridge Preservation and Socket Seal After Tooth Extraction
NCT02844569 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation Using Xenogenic Bone Graft and Pre-hydrated Collagen Membrane
NCT04955873 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Zimmer Puros® Allograft vs. Creos™ Allograft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT02444052 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA