Epiglottic Downfolding During Endotracheal Intubation
NCT01691963 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL
Last updated 2016-01-28
Summary
Usually videolaryngoscopy using a videolaryngoscope with a classic Macintosh design is performed with the blade in the vallecula and the epiglottis elevated from the vocal cords indirectly, as in direct laryngoscopy. However, during an audit of videolaryngoscopic practice we noticed that, in obtaining the best view, clinicians frequently and inadvertently advanced the blade into the vallecula to get a better view, such that the epiglottis was downfolded and elevated directly from the vocal cords. However, a better view does not necessarily lead to higher intubation success.
In this randomized, controlled trial, we want to determine the efficacy of videolaryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation using an alternative position for the blade in patients with normal airways.
Conditions
- Intubation Complication
- Injury of Epiglottis
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
C-MAC® videolaryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany)
Endotracheal intubation will be achieved using a C-MAC® videolaryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) with a size 3 Macintosh blade. The best possible view of the glottic inlet will be scored with the blade tip positioned in the vallecula. Next, the view of the glottic inlet will be scored with the blade advanced further into the vallecula, until the epiglottis flips infero-posteriorly and becomes downfolded into the trachea. The glottic view will be scored in both positions using the Cormack and Lehane classification system. After successful intubation, the blade will slowly be withdrawn into the vallecula to elevate the epiglottis back to its normal position.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Barbe MA Pieters, MD · Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2016-01-31
- Completion
- 2016-01-31
Countries
- Netherlands
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Intubation Conditions of the Articulating Stylet and Intubating Stylet Guided Videolaryngoscopy
NCT02805569 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Macintosh Versus GlideScope Versus C-MAC for Double Lumen Endotracheal Intubation
NCT05091281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes by Using the Videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope
NCT02564640 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combined Technique for Difficult Intubation
NCT01691703 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endotrol-tracheal Tube Assisted Endotracheal Intubation During Video Laryngoscopy
NCT01099969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation
NCT04759300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation
NCT05902013 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Glottis Visualization in Different Lifting Methods
NCT05967338 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
McGrath Video Laryngoscope for All Intubations in the Operating Room
NCT05850260 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.
NCT03230422 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
GlideScope Groove vs. Standard GlideScope: A Non-inferiority Study
NCT01489605 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endotracheal Tube Placement Using McGrath MAC® Video Laryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope
NCT03503279 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Assembled Modified Macintosh Videolaryngoscope Versus McGrath Macintosh (MAC®) Videolaryngoscope: Which is Better?
NCT04850976 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Video and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients Who May be Difficult to Intubate
NCT00178555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Double-lumen Tube Intubation Technique to Reduce Laryngeal Injuries
NCT01441362 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Macintosh Blade Size During Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation. A Prospective Observational Study.
NCT05059067 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Endotracheal Tube Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
NCT01936662 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Glidescope Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children
NCT03326882 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope and the Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in the Prehospital Setting
NCT04930419 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
STorz Against Glidescope Effectiveness
NCT01632683 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Management Study to Evaluate the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope as an Alternative to the Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT01122433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study of Glidescope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Adult Hypertensive Patients
NCT03316443 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Initial Experience With Storz C-MAC Video Intubation System
NCT01104090 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngeal Morbidity After Endotracheal Intubation - Endoflex-tube Versus Use of Stylet
NCT00953433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video- Or Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in Newborns
NCT04994652 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA