Bond Apatite in Horizontal Augmentation Versus Bio-Oss

NCT06043258 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 16

Last updated 2023-09-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Sixteen healthy patients selected from the Outpatient Clinic of the Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Diagnosis and Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University for the replacement of missing single maxillary anterior or premolar tooth (in the esthetic zone) by dental implant. Patients were selected according to the following criteria: 1) Patients older than 18 years. 2) Good general health, with no systemic diseases that might contraindicate receiving a dental implant. 3) Every patient should have at least one missing tooth in the maxillary anterior premolar area and subsequently scheduled for implant supported prosthesis. 4) The tooth has been extracted from at least 3 months. 5) Insufficient horizontal bone (class III according to Len Tolstunov classification. 6) Good oral hygiene.

Patients were classified into two groups:

Group (I) (study group): eight patients with missing anterior or premolar tooth with insufficient horizontal (bucco/labio palatal) bone width were treated with dental implants and Bond Apatite (AugmaBio, United States of America) as a bone graft material to fill the defect.

Group (II) (positive control group): eight patients with missing anterior or premolar tooth with insufficient horizontal (bucco/labio palatal) bone width were treated with dental implants and Bio-Oss (Bio-Oss, GeistlichPharmaAG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) as a bone graft material to fill the defect and pericardium resorbable membrane.

Patients were evaluated with the following clinical and radiological parameters presurgical and 12 months after operation:

A) Clinical evaluation:

The following parameters were evaluated:

1. Modified plaque index:

This is fundamentally based on the visual detection of plaque, it ascertains the thickness of plaque along the gingival margin, namely the desirability of distinguishing clearly between severity and the location of soft debris aggregates.
2. Modified gingival index:

It is a method to assess the severity of gingivitis based on gingival color, contour, presence of bleeding, stippling and crevicular fluid flow. It is completely noninvasive method (only visual).
3. Probing depth:

Peri-implant pocket depth was measured using plastic implant probe (contrast PA probe # CPNG22, Helmut Zepf Medizintechnik Gmbh®) after final restoration was inserted.

B) Radiographic evaluation:

Bone width was assessed using CBCT 12 months after implant insertion. Bone width measurements were made on tomographic slices perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the alveolar crest; 2 mm from the alveolar crest.

Conditions

  • Horizontal Ridge Deficiency

Interventions

OTHER

Bond Apatite

composite graft formed of biphasic calcium sulphate and hydroxyapatite at a ratio of 2:1

OTHER

Bio-Oss

xenograft bone substitute

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-10-10
Primary Completion
2021-05-15
Completion
2022-05-27

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06043258 on ClinicalTrials.gov