Compare Preperitoneal Analgesia to Epidural Analgesia for Pain Control After Colon and Rectal Surgery

NCT01552226 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 98

Last updated 2025-09-15

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

This is a prospective randomized study of 114 patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of two standard methods of analgesia for pain control in patients undergoing elective colon and rectal surgery, as measured by the Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) and by the need for supplemental narcotic analgesics. This study is designed to determine if postoperative pain control by local analgesics delivered through preperitoneally placed ON-Q Silver Soaker™ catheters (CPA) is equivalent to continuous epidural analgesia (CEA).

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia

Preperitoneal catheter placed at the completion of surgery in the standard fashion.

DEVICE

Continuous Epidural Analgesia

Epidural catheter placed prior to the operation in the standard fashion.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Trinity Health Michigan

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Robert Cleary, MD · Trinity Health Michigan

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-01-31
Primary Completion
2015-03-31
Completion
2015-03-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01552226 on ClinicalTrials.gov