Comparison of Outcomes of Two Approaches in Microsurgical Varicocelectomy in Chinese Infertile Males: A Prospective Randomized, Controlled Trial

NCT01463787 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2013-04-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Varicocele is the most common surgical disease which could lead to male infertility. It is found in approximately 15% adult males, and in about 40% infertile males. And the incidence is up to 80% in secondary infertility. In the past, there was continuous controversy over whether a varicocele repair could improve fertility. But at present, researches are coming to a consensus on the indication of varicocelectomy. Several researches manifest that the microsurgery of varicocele could have the effect of the highest spontaneous pregnancy and lowest complications rate after surgery. Microsurgical varicocelectomy includes two approaches, inguinal and subinguinal. Each one has its advantages and disadvantages. There are few studies which make direct comparison between the two methods in microsurgical varicocelectomy, especially in China. Operators have made decisions on the basis of their own experience and skills. In this study, the investigators compare the postoperative spontaneous pregnancy and complications rates in two approaches in microsurgical varicocelectomy for Chinese infertile men in their hospital.

Conditions

  • Varicocele

Interventions

PROCEDURE

microsurgical varicocelectomy in inguinal approach

In inguinal approach, the incision, which was about 3cm, was made two fingers up the pubic symphysis, from external inguinal rings parallel to the inguinal ligament.

PROCEDURE

microsurgical varicocelectomy in subinguinal approach

In subinguinal approach, the incision was about 3 cm horizontal and 1 cm below the external inguinal ring.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Feng Pan

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
46 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-01-31
Primary Completion
2010-12-31
Completion
2010-12-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01463787 on ClinicalTrials.gov