Framing and Decision Making in Neonatology

Summary

The purpose of this study is to study how people make decisions regarding delivery room management for infants born extremely premature when survival and long term outcomes are uncertain. The hypothesis is that the way in which information is presented will impact decisions.

There have been many advances in neonatal care in recent decades. However, the investigators do not know if these children will grow up to be healthy or if they will have problems with mental retardation, behavior or physical handicaps. In these circumstances, where the medical profession cannot predict what sort of life a child will have, parents have a choice of having intensive care started or of allowing the baby to die naturally. The age most often cited by physicians at which this care is optional and under parental discretion is 23 weeks gestation.

The purpose of this study was to ask people, recruited through the world wide web, what they would want for the doctor to do in the case of a hypothetical 23 week premature delivery in order to evaluate the decision process and the presence of autonomous choice. This study had two parts. The first part, presented outcome information in 2 different ways -either as survival and lack of severe disability or as mortality and presence of severe disability. The results of the first part have been published (Message Framing and Perinatal Decisions, Pediatrics, 2008). The second part, investigated whether the way in which the way in which delivery room management options were presented- either as agreeing with a course of action or opting out- impacted resuscitation decisions. This part was administered as a separate survey to a different sample of participants at a later date. The remainder of the questionnaires asked demographic and opinion questions as a means to assess variables that may influence how people respond to the information they receive.

Conditions

• Prematurity
• Framing
• Perinatal Decision Making

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Survey

Participants were randomized to one of two survey groups. In one arm (resuscitation default arm), resuscitation was presented as the course of action that would be followed unless the participant objected. In the other arm (comfort care default arm), comfort care was presented as the course of action that would be followed unless the participant objected.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Columbia University

  lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

• Ryan Murphy, PhD · Columbia University

• Elke U Weber · Columbia University

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Masking

NONE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

18 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2006-05-31

Primary Completion

2007-04-30

Completion

2007-04-30

Countries

• United States

Study Locations