Application of Two Different Synthetic Sequential Media for the Human IVF-Embryo Transfer (IVF-ET) Program

NCT01356238 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 360

Last updated 2011-05-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Quality-controlled commercial media have been used in many in-vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratories. However, commercial media are costly and difficult to compare directly because their exact compositions are not clearly indicated. Although commercially available media have commonly been used in most IVF programs worldwide, there are several advantages to the use of in-house synthetic sequential media at IVF laboratories. First, the results of quality control should be reliable due to a stringent protocol setting-up. Second, any direct supplementations or deletions of specific components are feasible to obtain good quality embryos and high pregnancy rates since those components can be defined. Finally, dependence on commercially available media diminishes so that the laboratory can more easily accommodate unexpected situations or problems, such as a sudden increase in IVF patients. Therefore, the present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of in-house MRC media in the human IVF-embryo transfer (ET) program to that of commercially available media.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

MRC media

Culture media

OTHER

Sydney IVF media

Culture media

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Maria Fertility Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jeong Yoon, M.S. · Maria Fertility Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
39 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-11-30
Primary Completion
2010-09-30
Completion
2010-10-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01356238 on ClinicalTrials.gov