Fast-track Perioperative Program for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
NCT01341366 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 128
Last updated 2013-04-30
Summary
Background:
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been shown by randomized trials to be associated with better short-term clinical outcomes when compared with open surgery. However, in a traditional perioperative care setting, the reduction in hospital stay following laparoscopic surgery in these trials was modest. Fast-track perioperative programs have been introduced in the West to optimize perioperative factors to reduce the physiological/psychological stress of open colorectal surgery. However, few studies have evaluated the impact of fast-track programs on the outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Objective:
To compare the clinical and immunological outcomes of Hong Kong Chinese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with a "traditional" vs. a "fast-track" perioperative program.
Design:
Prospective randomized trial.
Subjects:
One hundred and twenty-eight consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection of non-metastatic colonic and upper rectal cancer will be recruited.
Interventions:
Patients will be randomized to a "traditional" or a "fast-track" perioperative program.
Outcome measures:
Primary outcome: total postoperative hospital stay, including hospital stay of patients who are readmitted within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes: immunological parameters (including systemic cytokine response and cell-mediated immune function), morbidity and mortality, quality of life, and medical costs.
Conditions
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Fast-track perioperative program
Preoperative counseling, no preoperative fasting, short-acting anesthetics, continuous infiltration of wound with local anesthetic agent, non-opioid pain management, the use of chewing gum, and early postoperative feeding and mobilization
- OTHER
-
Traditional perioperative program
Preoperative fasting, standard anesthetic management with no intraoperative fluid restriction, opioid pain management, no chewing gum, feeding/mobilization according to attending surgeon
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Chinese University of Hong Kong
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Simon SM Ng, MD · Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2013-03-31
- Completion
- 2013-03-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: … A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00155727 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients Of Colon and Upper Rectal Cancer
NCT05953662 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Treating Patients With Colorectal Cancer
NCT00003354 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Short-term Outcomes of Day Surgery for Patients With CuRC
NCT04646915 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT04527861 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Autologous Blood Marker Localization in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery
NCT05597384 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single-port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
NCT01626963 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Multivisceral Radical Resection for Surgical T4b Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score-matched Study Comparing the the Laparoscopic and Open Approaches
NCT05707598 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Length of Hospital Stay, Nursing Hours and Recovery After Laparoscopic Versus Open Colon Resection Without Fast Track
NCT01127425 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial to Assess Robot-assisted Surgery and Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery in Patients With Mid or Low Rectal Cancer
NCT01423214 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Operations for Colon Cancer
NCT00202111 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial for Single Port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Colectomy
NCT01101672 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Robotic Top-down Intersphincteric Resection
NCT05961969 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Multi-Center Randomised Controlled Study to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT00788281 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Randomized Prospective Trial for Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT00470951 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Endo-Laparoscopic Approach Versus Conventional Open Surgery in Obstructing Left-sided Colon Cancer: RCT
NCT00654212 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Fast-Track Colorectal Surgery in Senior Patients
NCT01646190 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Trial on Robotic Assisted Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT01130233 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Fast Track in Open Colonic Surgery - A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT00556790 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection in Elderly
NCT05563441 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopy-Assisted Transanal Endoscopy Rectosigmoid Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT01340755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery Compared With Open Surgery in Treating Patients With Colon Cancer
NCT00002575 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT02966483 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The PROtective Ventilation Using Open Lung Approach Or Not Trial
NCT03160144 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RCT on Elderly Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery With Enhanced Geriatric Care
NCT02352688 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA