The PROtective Ventilation Using Open Lung Approach Or Not Trial
NCT03160144 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 280
Last updated 2019-12-03
Summary
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPC) are very common. It severely affects postoperative recovery, particularly in the abdominal surgery. Patients with laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer generally have a higher age and decreased lung function reserve. At the same time, they prone to developing atelectasis due to the effects of pneumoperitoneum pressure. Therefore, they are a high-risk group of respiratory insufficiency and PPC.
Mechanical ventilation with a low tidal volume is a routine in clinic nowadays. However, this conventional strategy will also result in atelectasis formation. Therefore, it may deteriorate the vulnerable lung function of patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Patients with Acute Lung Injury or Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ALI/ARDS) could benefit from the "open lung approach", including the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers (RMs). Whether a lung protective mechanical ventilation strategy with medium levels of PEEP and repeated RMs, the "open lung approach", protects against respiratory insufficiency and PPC during laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is uncertain. The present study aims at comparing the effects of "open lung approach" mechanical ventilation strategy and conventional mechanical ventilation strategy in PPC, extra-pulmonary complications, length of hospital stay, biomarkers of lung injury and changes of respiratory function in patients undergoing general anesthesia for laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer.
Conditions
- Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
- Respiratory Insufficiency
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
open lung approach
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Sanqing Jin, MD · Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
-
Hong Li, MD · Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- SEQUENTIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-01-12
- Primary Completion
- 2018-09-20
- Completion
- 2018-10-12
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Laparoscopic Assisted Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Carcinoma
NCT00485316 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients Of Colon and Upper Rectal Cancer
NCT05953662 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Trial of Incisionless Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Colectomy for Left-sided Colonic Tumors
NCT01762254 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Operations for Colon Cancer
NCT00202111 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT04527861 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison Between Traditional Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery and NOSES in Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer
NCT03470142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT00147134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection in Elderly
NCT05563441 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery Compared With Open Surgery in Treating Patients With Colon Cancer
NCT00002575 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Length of Hospital Stay, Nursing Hours and Recovery After Laparoscopic Versus Open Colon Resection Without Fast Track
NCT01127425 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer With Visceral Obesity
NCT07314996 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Open Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Gastric Cancer Resection.
NCT03447106 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Treating Patients With Colorectal Cancer
NCT00003354 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effect of General Anesthesia and Mechanical Ventilation on Plasma Metabolite in Patient With Colorectal Cancer Resection
NCT03137628 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Multi-Center Randomised Controlled Study to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT00788281 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Assessment of Autologous Blood Marker Localization in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery
NCT05597384 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Surgery Assistant Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Colorectal Cancer
NCT04268290 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Enhanced Recovery Program After Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Surgery
NCT02399631 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The Role of Pelvic Peritonization in Laparoscopic or Robotic Low Anterior Resection
NCT03699761 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT00741676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
The Patient in Laparoscopic Colon Surgery:Impact of Comorbidities,Frailty,Malnutrition and Sarcopenia on Short-term Mortality
NCT04729738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Short- and Long-term Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy of Right Colon Cancer : A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis
NCT07029464 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Safety Study of Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT02117557 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Study to Evaluate Oxygen Monitoring at Different Stages of Neuromuscular Blockade in Colorectal Surgery
NCT02327494 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Role of Indexed Oxygen Delivery in Anastomotic Insufficiencies in Elective Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections for Cancer
NCT07099820 ·Status: COMPLETED