Comparison of Two Radial Head Implants

NCT01269840 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 41

Last updated 2014-10-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In severe injuries of the radial head with multiple, displaced fracture fragments and concomitant ligament damage, excision of the fragments and replacement of the radial head with a metallic implant are indicated. Current radial head implants are composed of metal or a combination of metal and high molecular weight polyethylene. The prostheses are assembled intra-operatively as a solid unit (monopolar) or as an articulating implant with motion between the stem and head (bi-polar). The stem of the implant is inserted into the proximal radius for support and can be classified as either loose-fitting or fixed. According to the investigators, there are no studies that directly compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between different radial head implant designs. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results in patients treated for an irreparable radial head fracture with either a smooth stem, bipolar radial head implant or a monopolar, in-growth radial head implant. The study findings may provide useful clinical information regarding the similarities and differences in these two implant designs.

Conditions

  • Radial Head Fractures

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Rush University

    collaborator OTHER
  • North Shore University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Northwestern University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • John Berschback, MD · Northwestern University

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-03-31
Primary Completion
2012-06-30
Completion
2013-09-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01269840 on ClinicalTrials.gov