Effectiveness of Stiffening Wire in Colonoscopy With Pre-Owned Colonoscopes
NCT01115010 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 112
Last updated 2011-08-03
Summary
The study aims to determine whether a proprietary, FDA approved stiffening wire improves the efficiency of colonoscopy (that is, decreases the duration of the procedure) and/or enables complete visualization of the colon in a greater proportion of cases (than when the procedure is performed without it) with old, used colonoscopes.
Colonoscopes are designed with a delicate balance between stiffness and flexibility. Stiffness helps to prevent curling (looping) of the colonoscope in those sections of the colon that are not fixed to the wall of the abdominal cavity and flexibility enables successful negotiation of bends or flexures in the colon. As colonoscopes age, they lose stiffness and this makes it very challenging to advance the colonoscope all the way to the cecum (the upper end of the colon). Even when the cecum is successfully reached, it may take an inordinately long time.
In Jamaica, most endoscopists (General Surgeons and Gastroenterologists) use older, pre-owned colonoscopes imported from the USA, because the average patient and local health insurance companies cannot bear the level of fees that would enable cost recovery for new equipment.
The stiffening wires (in two grades of stiffness) used in this study are passed through the biopsy channel of the colonoscope only after its tip has passed the upper end of the descending colon and entered the transverse colon. The device is safe when used as recommended by the manufacturers (and approved by the FDA), and does not appear to increase risk over and above the risk of colonoscopy with the unassisted colonoscope. Although the device clearly improves the stiffness of the colonoscope, there is no research evidence that it actually works in practice, either to improve cecal intubation rate or to decrease procedure time. It is therefore also unclear whether the possible benefit of using the device is achieved if introduced at the first opportunity allowed by the manufacturers or only after difficulty is encountered with the unassisted colonoscope.
In this study, patients are randomly assigned to one of 3 "interventions". One group has colonoscopy performed with the colonoscope alone and the wires are only introduced if there is difficulty advancing the colonoscope after it has passed into the transverse colon ("difficulty" defined as failure to advance the tip of the colonoscope after 5 minutes). In the 2nd and 3rd groups, the assigned wire will be introduced as soon as the colonoscope enters the transverse colon and is removed if "difficulty" is encountered, as defined above. The different phases of colonoscopy will be timed with a stop watch and when a sufficient number of patients has been accrued, the investigator will be able to compare the time it takes to complete the procedure with and without the wires as well as the proportion of cases in which the cecum was reached with and without the assistance of the wires.
Conditions
- Colonoscopy
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Colonoscope stiffening device
Colonoscopy is performed with the unassisted colonoscope (Olympus CF-100TL). The "standard" stiffening wire is introduced only if there is difficulty advancing the colonoscope and only after the tip has passed the splenic flexure. Difficulty is defined as failure to advance the tip of the scope after 5 minutes of trying. If difficulty is again encountered, the "firm" wire replaces the "standard" wire. Further difficulty requires removal of the firm wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.
- DEVICE
-
Colonoscope stiffening device
"Standard" stiffening wire introduced routinely on entry into transverse colon. If difficulty is encountered (as defined previously), the "standard" wire is removed and attempts made to advance the colonoscope without it. Further difficulty requires introduction of the "firm" wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.
- DEVICE
-
Colonoscope stiffening device
"Firm" stiffening wire introduced routinely on entry into transverse colon. If difficulty is encountered (as defined previously), the wire is removed and attempts made to advance the colonoscope without it. Further difficulty requires introduction of the "standard" wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
MoBay Hope Medical Center, Jamaica
collaborator OTHER -
Cornwall Regional Hospital
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Jeffrey M East, MD · Cornwall Regional Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2011-01-31
- Completion
- 2011-01-31
Countries
- Jamaica
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Validation Study of a Computerized Movement Analysis of the Colonoscope in Simulated Colonoscopy
NCT03401723 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time
NCT00314418 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Colonoscopy Using Motorized Spiral Enteroscope
NCT04895254 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Can Simple and Inexpensive Techniques Enhance Patient Comfort
NCT00747084 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Cap-assisted Water Immersion Versus Water Immersion Colonoscopy
NCT01547247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implementation of Evidence Based Practices for Colonoscopy: The Strategies to Improve Colonoscopy Study
NCT02723370 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
9 Minutes for Colonoscopy Withdrawal
NCT03399045 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cap Assisted Colonoscopy Enhances Quality Based Competency in Colonoscopy Among Trainees
NCT02472730 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Digital Tools on the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT05734079 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cap-attached Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy for Trainees
NCT01400087 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Characterize Differences in Force Patterns Used by Different Endoscopists and Trainee Endoscopists
NCT01029899 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
9 Minutes for Tandem Colonoscopy Withdrawal
NCT04797065 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
An Interactive Video Educational Tool Improves the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT04491565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Colonoscopy Educational Video Upon Inner City Population
NCT02906969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Water Assisted Colonoscopy vs Air Insufflation on Resident Training
NCT04987645 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Assessing Effect of Withdrawal Time on Adenoma Detection Rate for Screening Colonoscopy
NCT05018325 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Video Education to Improve First Time Colonoscopy Outcomes
NCT06981650 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Handheld Colonoscopy Force Monitor by Expert Endoscopists in the Performance of Colonoscopy
NCT00797914 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Improving Competency and Metrics for PoLypectomy Skills Using Evaluation Tools and VidEo Feedback (COMPLETE)
NCT03115008 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of The Factors Affecting Bowel Preparation Adequacy for Colonoscopy
NCT05107505 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
RCT of Air Insufflation Versus Water Infusion Colonoscopy by Supervised Trainees
NCT00841282 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Colonoscopy Versus Colonoscopy With Endocuff Vision
NCT03361917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Utility of Time Segmental Withdrawal During Screening Colonoscopy for Increasing Adenoma Detection Rate.
NCT02538406 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Water Injection Colonoscopy vs Air Insufflation Colonoscopy in Experienced Endoscopists
NCT01797406 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Optimizing Timing of Follow-up Colonoscopy
NCT04889352 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA