MedTrace Logo

Cap-attached Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy for Trainees

NCT01400087 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 500

Last updated 2021-09-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to assess the efficacy of cap-attached colonoscopy to improve cecal intubation in comparison with regular colonoscopy for trainees.

Conditions

  • Colonoscopy
  • Lower Gastrointestinal Tract

Interventions

DEVICE

Cap-attached Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy

Trainees were divided into two group; Cap-attached Colonoscopy group or Regular Colonoscopy group. Trainees allocated to the former group undergo colonoscopy with cap for all cases, the latter without cap.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Showa University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Shin-ei Kudo · Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-06-30
Primary Completion
2013-11-30
Completion
2013-11-30

Countries

  • Japan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01400087 on ClinicalTrials.gov