MedTrace Logo

A Comparison of the Studer Pouch Versus the T-Pouch Orthotopic Neobladder Urinary Diversion in Bladder Cancer Patients

NCT01008865 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 529

Last updated 2019-01-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a prospective, randomized study of two types of continent ileal neobladder construction in patients undergoing cystectomy for primary bladder cancer. Patients will be randomly assigned to have either a T-pouch or a Studer pouch constructed at the time of their surgery. They will be followed long-term to determine the relative advantages and disadvantages of the two types of diversion. The investigators' hypothesis is that the inclusion of an antireflux mechanism in the T-pouch will result in significantly fewer episodes of symptomatic urinary tract infection, and will have a lower incidence of upper tract dilation and loss of renal function over the long term.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Studer Pouch orthotopic urinary diversion

PROCEDURE

T-Pouch orthotopic urinary diversion

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Southern California

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Siamak Daneshmand, MD · University of Southern California

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2002-01-04
Primary Completion
2018-06-14
Completion
2018-06-14

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01008865 on ClinicalTrials.gov