Comparison of Individual Computer Aided Design/Manufactured (CAD/CAM) - Based Implants Consisting on Hydroxylapatite and Titanium to be Used in Cranioplasty
NCT00923793 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 53
Last updated 2015-05-21
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the results of cranioplasty with CAD/CAM (computer aided design/manufactured) based Hydroxylapatite and Titanium implants in respect to infections, re-operations, antibiotic treatment or removal of the implant.
Conditions
- Skull Defects
- Cranioplasty
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Titanium implant (CranioConstruct™)
One to three weeks before operation the skull defect is well defined using Computer tomography. Based on these results the Titanium implant is ordered.
- DEVICE
-
Hydroxylapatite (CustomBone)
Six to eight weeks before operation the skull defect is well defined using Computer tomography. Based on these results the Hydroxylapatite implant is ordered.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
collaborator OTHER -
University of Leipzig
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Dirk Lindner, Dr. med. · Universität Leipzig KöR Medizinische Falkutät Klinif für Neurochirurgie
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2014-04-30
- Completion
- 2014-04-30
Countries
- Germany
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Calcium Phosphate Cement With Patient-specific Implants for Cranial Reconstruction
NCT03841643 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Vertical and Horizontal Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Techniques
NCT06636084 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Reconstruction of the Skull Using a Metal Ceramic Implant After Previously Failed Reconstruction
NCT01899807 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stryker PEEK Customized Implant: A Prospective Post Market Follow Up to Evaluate Safety, Performance and Effectiveness
NCT05362370 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Graftless Technique in Open Maxillary Sinus Lifting Using PEEK Versus Ti -Meshwork
NCT06846632 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographical Assessment of Patients With Sub-condylar Fracture Using Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Trapezoidal Plates Versus Titanium Trapezoidal Plates
NCT06940115 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Based Algorithm for Patient Specific Implants for Cranioplasty in Patients With Skull Defects
NCT02828306 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Accuracy& Orbital Volume Using Patient Specific Titanium Implant Vs Zirconia for Orbital Floor Reconstruction
NCT06369129 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Reconstruction of Deficient Maxillary Ridges Using Retromolar Blocks With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT06900933 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Pilot Study to Evidence Improved Cranial Flap Fixation With a Bioresorbable Bone Adhesive
NCT06095531 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed PEEK Implants for Cranioplasty
NCT05291754 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Titanium Mesh Coated With Natural Hydroxyapatite Nanocrystals in Orbital Reconstruction
NCT05437731 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Pilot Clinical Study to Evidence Improved Cranial Flap Fixation With a Bioresorbable Bone Adhesive
NCT06780852 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-dimensional Bone Regeneration Using Custom-made Meshes With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT04286334 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of 3D Bone Matrix in Cranioplasty
NCT06792864 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE3
-
CAD/CAM Angle Fracture Reduction/Plate Guide and Customized 3D Grid Plate Versus Champy's Technique
NCT06392204 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Maximal Incisal Opening Using Patient Specific Titanium Eminoplasty Versus Inlay Autogenous Bone Graft for Treatment of Chronic Mandibular Condylar Dislocation
NCT03728270 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed Titanium Mesh vs Guided Autogenous Graft
NCT05550285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Reconstruction of Deficient Atrophic Ridges Using Guide Bone Regeneration Technique
NCT06746935 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cranioplasty: Autogenous Bone Graft Versus Artificial Substitutes
NCT03218150 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Vertical Ridge Augmentation With Autogenous Onlay Blocks Combined With Guided Bone Regeneration Versus Autogenous Bone Graft With Titanium Mesh in Posterior Mandible
NCT03680118 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness of a Flexible Hydroxyapatite-Based Composite for Jaw Bone Regeneration
NCT06552715 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Comparing the Efficacy and Morbidity of Two Vertical Ridge Augmentation Techniques
NCT02703480 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Phicogenic vs. Xenogeneic Biomaterial for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation
NCT03682315 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reinforced PTFE Meshes Versus Customized Titanium Meshes
NCT04257097 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA