Single Port Access (SPA) Cholecystectomy Versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00904865 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2009-05-20
Summary
Background:
Single port access surgery is a rapidly progressing surgical approach which allows performance of standard laparoscopic surgery through a single transparietal port instead of multiple port accesses.
Objective:
Demonstrate the validity of Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy compared to multiple ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Hypothesis:
SPA cholecystectomy is associated with decreased parietal and body image trauma compare to multiple ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SPA cholecystectomy should be associated with better cosmetic results, may improve postoperative recovery due to lower parietal pain. SPA cholecystectomy may also be associated with decreased rate of parietal complications as lower numbers of transparietal port are placed.
Methods:
All patients offered cholecystectomy, either SPA or multiport cholecystectomy, included in the study will have recognized biliary pathology for which formal indication cholecystectomy are recognized internationally.
Surgical technique, either for SPA cholecystectomy or for multiple ports cholecystectomy, will be the same except, that one surgical technique is achieved through a single transparietal port and the other through multiple ports.
Randomization will be performed before surgeries after patients have given their informed consent to the study.
No specific test or cost will be necessitated by the study. Patients will be informed orally and will receive a short study summary, allowing them to give an informed consent.
Endpoints:
* Morbidity
* Body image and Cosmetic results
* Post-operative pain (opioid sparing effect)
* Operative time
* Hospital stay
Conditions
- Symptomatic Gallbladder Stones
- Cholecystitis
- Biliary Pancreatitis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
SPA cholecystectomy
SPA cholecystectomy
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospital, Geneva
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Pascal Bucher, MD · University Hospital, Geneva
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2011-02-28
Countries
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Comparison of Single Port and Four Port Laparoscopic Gallbladder Removal
NCT01489436 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00678873 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
NCT05728463 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sleeve Gastrectomy and Cholecystectomy Are Safe in Obese Patients With Asymptomatic Cholelithiasis
NCT04878640 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Multi-Port Versus Single-port Cholecystectomy
NCT01104727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Acute Cholecystitis: Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; Randomized Prospective Study
NCT02130245 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Peri-operative and Acute Outcomes After Robotic-assisted Cholecystectomy
NCT04551820 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01195285 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00981604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Impact on Postoperative Pain
NCT01348620 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Single Trocar Cholecystectomy to Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00732550 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Pain in Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01824186 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ERCP Plus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Cholecystectomy
NCT05901363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
NOTES-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
NCT00486655 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Emergency Versus Elective Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis in the Era of Laparoscopy.
NCT05502744 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One-stage and Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in Cholecystocholedocholithiasis
NCT06676241 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Hybrid Natural Orifice Translumenal Surgery
NCT00835250 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Clinical Outcomes of the Percutaneous Cholecystostomy, Supportive Care Versus Cholecystectomy.
NCT01894321 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Solo Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03018964 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cases of Acute Cholecystitis
NCT05484232 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Benchmarks in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06692517 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is no More Risky in Emergent Cases With in Cardiopulmonary Risk: Fundus-Callot Cholecystectomy With Low Pressure Pneumo-peritoneum VS Open Cholecystectomy
NCT04373447 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prolonged Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
NCT05736003 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Natural Orifice Transgastric Endoscopic Surgical Removal of the Gallbladder
NCT01174069 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparo-endoscopic Single Site (LESS) Cholecystectomy Versus Standard LAP-CHOLE
NCT01339325 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4