A Comparison of Single Port and Four Port Laparoscopic Gallbladder Removal
NCT01489436 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 118
Last updated 2019-03-19
Summary
New minimally invasive surgical treatments are often outpatient procedures with low complication rates, promising fast recovery. The traditional physician-reported outcomes such as complication rates, blood loss, and hospital stay are not useful to guide treatment recommendations for one or the other minimally invasive procedure. This study aims to apply patient-reported outcomes developed within the NIH framework for cancer research and chronic disease treatment to the comparative effectiveness research in minimally invasive procedures for benign disease.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Single-port cholecystectomy
In brief, a flexible, multi-sleeve 15-mm trocar designed specifically for single-port cholecystectomy will be inserted at the umbilicus via a 15-mm single incision. This trocar permits simultaneous introduction of multiple instruments, including a 5-mm flexible-tip laparoscope. Standard 5-mm instruments will be used for retraction and dissection. An additional 2-mm grasping device may be introduced in the right upper quadrant for retraction if necessary. A 5-mm laparoscopic clip applier will be introduced through the periumbilical trocar to ligate the cystic artery and the cystic duct. The gallbladder will be removed through the umbilical port.
- PROCEDURE
-
Four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
The control procedure for the research practicum is a four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the current gold-standard operation. This approach utilizes a 10-mm trocar placed at the umbilicus via a 15-mm incision and three separate subcostal 5-mm trocars placed via separate 5-mm incisions. The gallbladder will be removed through the umbilical trocar site. On occasion, this incision needs to be enlarged to accommodate removal of the gallbladder.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Juliane Bingener-Casey, M.D. · Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2011-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2014-03-31
- Completion
- 2014-03-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Feasibility and Safety of a Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a 2-mm Mini-Instrument
NCT01571479 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
NCT05728463 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial of Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00892879 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:
NCT04107909 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety Study of Keyhole Gallbladder Surgery With Removal of Gallbladder Via the Stomach Rather Than Through the Skin
NCT01010685 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single Port Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Early Postoperative Pain
NCT01268748 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
NOTES-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
NCT00486655 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The Removing Port of the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Material
NCT02788942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmesis, Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After da Vinci Single Site and Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01932216 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs. Robotic Cholecystectomy
NCT03160157 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Sleeve Gastrectomy and Cholecystectomy Are Safe in Obese Patients With Asymptomatic Cholelithiasis
NCT04878640 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Natural Orifice Transgastric Endoscopic Surgical Removal of the Gallbladder
NCT01174069 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01195285 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of the Inflammatory Reaction in Standard vs Single Port Cholecystectomy for Uncomplicated Cholelithiasis
NCT01116492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Clinical Outcomes of the Percutaneous Cholecystostomy, Supportive Care Versus Cholecystectomy.
NCT01894321 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety of Laparoscopic ChOlecystectomy Performed by Trainee Surgeons With Different CHolangiographic Techniques
NCT04863482 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis Within and Beyond the First 72 Hours, Does it Differ?!
NCT06459323 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ERCP Plus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Cholecystectomy
NCT05901363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Small-incision Open Cholecystectomy or Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Disease
NCT00370344 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Prospective Multicenter Human Randomized Controlled Evaluation of NOTES® Cholecystectomy
NCT01171027 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Grade II Acute Cholecystitis Guidelines
NCT04979936 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00678873 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Oxidative Stress in Standard Laparoscopic vs Single Port Cholecystectomy
NCT01211743 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Multi-Port Versus Single-port Cholecystectomy
NCT01104727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery: Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy
NCT00910325 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2