Laparo-endoscopic Single Site (LESS) Cholecystectomy Versus Standard LAP-CHOLE
NCT01339325 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 180
Last updated 2011-04-20
Summary
The aim of this study is to assess possible differences between the LESS approach and the standard laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy. In particular, the Postoperative Quality of Life (QoL) will be investigated by analyzing the followings: length of hospital stay (LoS), postoperative pain, cosmetics and the results of SF 36 questionnaire. Furthermore, operative time, conversion to standard LC rate, difficulty of exposure, difficulty of dissection, and complication rate will be compared.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Cholecystectomy
Standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy The first cannula is inserted with an "open laparoscopy" technique. LCs are performed with either HF or US energized dissection, standard or fundus-first gallbladder dissection, closure of the artery by ligature/clip or US, closure of cystic duct by ligature/clip. Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy The TriPort device is inserted at the navel site through a 15 to 25 mm incision with an "open laparoscopy" technique. Two working instruments are inserted (one grasper and one energised device) through the TriPort. A further 1.8 or 3 mm instrument inserted through the larger gel valve, parallel to a 5 mm dissecting instrument, is used in some cases to enhance exposure. Gallbladder dissection is accomplished either after preparation of the cystic duct and artery or with a fundus-first technique, by means of HF electrosurgery or US shears.The cystic artery is divided between clips or by US scissors. The duct is divided between clips.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Marco Maria Lirici, FACS · San Giovanni Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2011-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2012-09-30
- Completion
- 2012-12-31
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Trial of Single Incision Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02375529 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Drain After Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00986544 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Impact on Postoperative Pain
NCT01348620 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life Measures After Single Access Vs Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Prospective Randomized Study.
NCT01412996 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Minilaparotomy and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Day Surgery Procedure
NCT01873638 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoendoscopic Rendez Vous Versus Standard Two Stage Approach for the Management of Cholelithiasis/Choledocholithiasis
NCT00416234 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ERCP Plus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Cholecystectomy
NCT05901363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Setting ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is a Safe Procedure in Patients With Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis
NCT04213092 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Oxidative Stress in Standard Laparoscopic vs Single Port Cholecystectomy
NCT01211743 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery vs Flexible Single Incision Surgery for Cholecystectomy
NCT01558414 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:
NCT04107909 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
EndoCone Single Port Versus Conventional Multi-port Laparoscopic Approach
NCT01709877 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01195285 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Risk of Metabolic Syndrome
NCT05557669 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01397565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Acute Cholecystitis: Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; Randomized Prospective Study
NCT02130245 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prolonged Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
NCT05736003 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Port Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Early Postoperative Pain
NCT01268748 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis in the Elderly: A Retrospective Study.
NCT04596306 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Early vs Late Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Common Bile Duct Stones Clearance Through Ercp.
NCT07130864 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
How to Predict Postoperative Complications After Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: the Chole-Risk Score
NCT04511910 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Conventional Versus Modified Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01312025 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Choledocolithiasis by Laparoscopic Exploration
NCT04690101 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study of the Inflammatory Reaction in Standard vs Single Port Cholecystectomy for Uncomplicated Cholelithiasis
NCT01116492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Laparoscopic Transcystic Biliary Drainage in the Management of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis
NCT06011941 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA