Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
NCT05728463 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1000
Last updated 2025-01-07
Summary
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been accepted and is nowadays considered as the gold standard treatment of gallstones disease. Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) was defined as three or four port surgery carried out with either French or American position. It reduced post-operative pain and shorten post-operative length of stay compared with open cholecystectomy in a great extent. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) as a revolutionized surgery, the main reason for its widespread use being the following: less post-operative pain, faster recovery, better cosmetics and quicker return to full activities, all resulting in the improvement of post-operative quality of life. SILC uses the umbilicus as a natural orifice allowing easy access to peritoneal cavity, easy conversion to standard laparoscopy and its easy closure, has been widely introduced into the clinical practice for benign gallbladder diseases. SILC can easily hide the surgical scar inside the umbilicus, thus has better cosmetic effect. But the real clinical benefits for patients still remain a matter of debate. In the last 5 years, many studies on SILC have been published, trying to answer the question whether such a new approach is worthwhile or not and whether is safe and cost-effective.Based on the above controversy, we conduct a RCT comparing clinical and peri-operative outcomes, such as quality of life (QOL), of SILC and CLC with the intent to assess the actual indications of the single-incision approach.
Conditions
- Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is defined as total or subtotal desection of the gallbladder laparoscopically.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Daren Liu, MD, PhD · Chief Physician
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-02-06
- Primary Completion
- 2025-01-02
- Completion
- 2025-01-02
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Single Setting ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is a Safe Procedure in Patients With Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis
NCT04213092 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Modified Laparoscopic Transcystic Biliary Drainage in the Management of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis
NCT06011941 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Children. Risk Factors for Conversion. A Prospective Study .
NCT06048029 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomised Comparison Between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01094379 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study of the Inflammatory Reaction in Standard vs Single Port Cholecystectomy for Uncomplicated Cholelithiasis
NCT01116492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Versus Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03067038 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:
NCT04107909 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prolonged Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
NCT05736003 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three Dimension Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Gallbladder Carcinoma
NCT03491878 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Feasibility and Safety of a Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a 2-mm Mini-Instrument
NCT01571479 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00678873 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Contrastive Study for Minimally Invasive Cholecystolithotomy With Gallbladder Reservation and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01822262 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sleeve Gastrectomy and Cholecystectomy Are Safe in Obese Patients With Asymptomatic Cholelithiasis
NCT04878640 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoperative Spillage of Bile and Gallstones During Laparoscopic Cholecysetectomy
NCT04041726 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Surgical Techniques: Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy IN Benign Gallbladder Disease
NCT07119203 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Choledocolithiasis by Laparoscopic Exploration
NCT04690101 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
ERCP Plus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Cholecystectomy
NCT05901363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Left Side of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04078451 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety of Laparoscopic ChOlecystectomy Performed by Trainee Surgeons With Different CHolangiographic Techniques
NCT04863482 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Drainage is Not Necessary Procedure After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Due to Severe Acute Cholecystitis
NCT01625247 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Potential Pulmonary Benefit of Low Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Selected Patients
NCT04670952 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs. Robotic Cholecystectomy
NCT03160157 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Needlescopic Versus Transvaginal/Transumbilical Cholecystectomy
NCT01685775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Single Port and Four Port Laparoscopic Gallbladder Removal
NCT01489436 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Three Ports and Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06873594 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA