MedTrace Logo

Comparison of an Easy to Read Advance Directive Versus a Standard Advance Directive

NCT00328055 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2011-04-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the acceptability, usefulness, self-efficacy and comprehension of an easy-to-read advance directive form versus a standard advance directive form written at a post graduate reading level.

Conditions

  • Aging

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

AD-Easy (Advance Directive-Easy)

BEHAVIORAL

AD-Standard (Advance Directive-Standard)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Pfizer

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

    lead NIH

Principal Investigators

  • Rebecca Sudore, MD · University of California, San Francisco

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2004-08-31
Completion
2005-07-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00328055 on ClinicalTrials.gov