A Migration and Bone Density Study Comparing Hi-Fatigue Bone Cement and Palacos Bone Cement
NCT01289834 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 52
Last updated 2024-04-18
Summary
The purpose of this scientific study is to compare early migration of hip prostheses in respect to the bone in order to determine whether there is a clinical difference between the two investigated bone cements (which one is best suited for cementation of hip prostheses).
Conditions
- Hip Arthritis
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Hi-Fatigue Bone Cement
Hi-Fatigue bone cement is a new development of Aap Biomaterials, GmbH \& Co that has not yet been tested in the clinical setting. Hi-Fatigue has a medium to low viscosity. Laboratory tests confirm Hi-Fatigue bone cement to have properties equivalent to or better than the golden standard bone cement" Palacos. Hi-Fatigue is to be used without pre-chilling. When mixed at a room temperature of 21°C Hi-Fatigue has a low initial viscosity improving mixing and theoretically reducing the porosity of the cured cement.
- DEVICE
-
Palacos Bone Cement
Palacos Bone Cement has been used for 48 years and has a good reputation as the "gold standard" among bone cements (3). It is a high-viscosity cement with rapid application that makes it advantageous for use in orthopedic joint surgery. Palacos cement was developed in order to allow hand mixing of monomers and polymers in a dish in the operating room. Air pollution with toxic monomers in the operating room was a problem that was primarily solved by exhaust ventilation, later supplemented with vacuum mixing
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Aarhus University Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
Zimmer Biomet
collaborator INDUSTRY -
University of Aarhus
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Kjeld Soballe, Professor MD · Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 71 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-04-30
- Completion
- 2024-01-31
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Femoral Remodeling Following Total Hip Arthroplasty With OMNI Apex Modular™ and OMNI Apex ARC™ Stem Compared to Competitive Designs
NCT01359540 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
10 Year Clinical Evaluation of Primoris Hip Component
NCT01326832 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
RSA-Study of Cemented Hip Prostheses With Five Different Articulations
NCT00698672 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
SmartSet HV and Palacos R RSA Bone Cements in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00837850 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Stability of Two Uncemented Hip Implants Used for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02656771 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Marathon and Enduron Polyethylene at Long-Term Follow-up
NCT02508428 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ceramic-on-ceramic THA for Post-traumatic Hip Osteoarthritis After Acetabular Fracture
NCT04034043 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Metal on Metal Versus Ceramic on Metal Hip Replacement
NCT00208494 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Comparison Hip Resurfacing Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)
NCT01359527 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study Comparing Marathon Polyethylene and Enduron Polyethylene Acetabular Liners Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01121146 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Defined Elements on DXA in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06324708 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hi-Fatigue G Bone Cement Retrospective Study
NCT06699134 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of Metal-on-conventional-polyethylene vs Ceramic-on-ceramic Articulating Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT03692364 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
NCT00913679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Migration in Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Cemented BiMobile Cup: Better Stability with More Cement?
NCT04049279 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Metal on Metal Versus Metal on Highly Crossed Linked Polyethylene Sytem
NCT01422564 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of Cemented and Cementless Fixation of Dual-mobility Hip Prosthesis in Elderly Patients With Osteoarthritis
NCT02404727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Uncemented Compared to Cemented Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02247791 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized RSA Study Comparing HXLPE to Conventional Polyethylene in Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT04322799 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compaction Femur Preparation for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Unilateral
NCT00318396 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density Changes After Implantation Of A Short Hip Stem Compared To A Straight Stem
NCT03147131 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Assess the Stability, Efficacy and Safety of the Silent™ Hip Prosthesis in Primary Total Hip Replacement
NCT00894140 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Comparing Ceramic-on-metal Articulation to Metal-on-metal Articulation in Cementless Primary Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00754520 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Metal Surface Finishes on Femoral Components in Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00116038 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Metal-metal Articulations Versus Standard 28 mm Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01113762 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2