MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Xenograft and Extended PRF as Jumping Gap Grafting Material Versus Natural Healing of the Socket Without Any Material.

NCT07797452 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2026-09-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to clinically and digitally evaluate immediate implants placed in mandibular molar extraction sockets and compare the outcomes of xenograft, e-PRF, and no grafting material within the jumping gap.

Conditions

  • Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation
  • Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Extraction Sockets
  • Jumping Gap

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Xenograft jumping gap filling material

after tooth extraction and implant placement, xenograft particulates were placed to fill the jumping gap before sealing the socket with a chairside socket sealing abutment.

PROCEDURE

e-PRF jumping gap filling material

after tooth extraction and implant placement, e-PRF was prepared from the patient's collected blood and placed to fill the jumping gap before sealing the socket with a chairside socket sealing abutment.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-02-02
Primary Completion
2026-08-25
Completion
2026-08-25

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07797452 on ClinicalTrials.gov