Comparison of Purse String Suture vs Transverse Mattress Suture to Maintain Hemostasis in Thinned-out Caesarean Sections Scars
NCT07758959 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2026-08-11
Summary
Brief Summary The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of purse-string suture versus transverse mattress suture for achieving hemostasis in women with thinned-out lower uterine segment scars undergoing repeat cesarean section. The study aims to determine whether the purse-string suture technique provides faster and more effective hemostasis than the transverse mattress suture technique.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does the purse-string suture reduce the time required to achieve hemostasis compared with the transverse mattress suture?
* Does the purse-string suture reduce the number of additional sutures required to achieve adequate hemostasis? Researchers will compare purse-string suturing with transverse mattress suturing to determine which technique achieves hemostasis more efficiently in women with thinned-out cesarean section scars.
Participants will:
* Undergo repeat cesarean section under standard surgical care.
* Be randomly assigned to receive either purse-string suturing or transverse mattress suturing for repair of the thinned-out lower uterine segment after closure of the first uterine layer.
* Have the time required to achieve hemostasis and the number of sutures required recorded intraoperatively.
* Receive routine postoperative management according to institutional protocols. Suggested improvement
Although the thesis mentions only time to achieve hemostasis and number of sutures as outcomes, ClinicalTrials.gov prefers that the primary outcome be clearly identified. Since your sample size was calculated using time to achieve hemostasis, I recommend presenting it as:
* Primary outcome: Time to achieve hemostasis (minutes)
* Secondary outcomes: Number of sutures required for hemostasis; duration of cesarean section (minutes)
Conditions
- Thinned-out Lower Uterine Segment Scar Previous Cesarean Section
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Purse-String Suture
Purse-string suturing of the thinned-out lower uterine segment during repeat cesarean section.
- PROCEDURE
-
Transverse Mattress Suture
Transverse mattress suturing of the thinned-out lower uterine segment during repeat cesarean section.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Lahore General Hospital
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Natasha Bushra
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-08-06
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-01
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Suture Material and C-Section Scar Niches: A Comparative Study
NCT07101952 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Niche
NCT04307524 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Impact of Double-layer Versus Single-layer Uterine Closure Suture in Cesarean Section on the Development of Postoperative Uterine Scar Deficiency
NCT03039803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
UTERUS CLOSURE TECHNIQUES and Uterine Niche Formation
NCT05517018 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Niche Investigated: Closure of Hysterotomy & Evaluation of 3 Suturing Techniques (Running, Interrupted, and Locked)
NCT06695793 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cesarean Scar Defects After Uterine Closure by Double-layer Barbed or Smooth Suture
NCT04825821 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing Decidual Inclusion vs. Exclusion in Uterine Suture Techniques During Cesarean Section to Improve Scar Thickness and Reduce Isthmocele Risk in Primiparous Women
NCT07608874 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Uterine Closure Techniques and Cesarean Scar Defect Risk
NCT05100147 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Hormonal and Hysteroscopic Management of Cesarean Scar Defect
NCT06529952 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Nonsurgical Management of Cesarean Scar Niche Related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
NCT05594186 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Uterine Scar Resection During Repeat Cesarean Delivery to Prevent Uterine Niche Formation
NCT07228858 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Double Vers Single in Cesarean Incision
NCT05276518 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cesarean Section Scar Niche: The Impact on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcome
NCT05966558 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Ultrasound Evaluation of Cesarean Scar After Uterotomy Closure With Barbed and Conventional Sutures
NCT03182010 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cesarean 123 Trial: Randomized Trial Comparing Single, Double and Triple Layer Uterine Closures During Cesarean Delivery
NCT05750394 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Vasopressin vs. Uterine Artery Clamping for Laparoscopic Cesarean Scar Niche Repair
NCT07446933 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Uterine Closure at C-section by Stratafix Tissue Control Device: Randomized Case-Control Study
NCT02288013 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of a Temporary Sub-Placental Uterine Tourniquet in Minimizing Intraoperative Blood Loss in Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder by a Retrograde Cesarean Hysterectomy (Bladder Last)
NCT05936645 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
2D and 3D Ultrasound Assessment of Cesarean Section Scars
NCT03111706 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Zip Incision Approximation vs. Suture for C-Section
NCT02915952 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hysteroscopic Evaluation of Cesarean Scar Defect
NCT03780699 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Treatment Outcomes of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
NCT07608094 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Long Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure
NCT01289262 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cesarean Section Scar Niche: The Impact on ART Outcome
NCT05358678 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Single-Layer Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Primary Cesarean Section
NCT07611331 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA