Evaluation Of the BEAUTIBOND XTREME Adhesive in Class I and II Restorations: One-Year Results.
NCT06899386 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2025-03-28
Summary
This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the performance of the Beautibond Xtreme adhesive system under different bonding techniques. Patients over 18 years old with restorative needs were selected, and 152 teeth were randomized using the "Research Randomizer Program" for allocation into control groups (CI - Class I restoration with total-etch conditioning; CII - Class II restoration with total-etch conditioning) and test groups (TI - Class I restoration in self-etch mode; TII - Class II restoration in self-etch mode; TIII - Class I restoration with selective enamel etching; TIV - Class II restoration with selective enamel etching). The restorations were evaluated (USPHS criteria) regarding anatomy, integrity, marginal staining, color, roughness, secondary caries lesions, postoperative sensitivity, and retention. Two calibrated examiners (Kappa test 0.84), blinded to the treatments, conducted evaluations for up to one year.
Conditions
- Adhesive System
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Group CI and CII - BeautiBond Xtreme (total-etch technique) + Beautifil LS
the enamel was etched for 30 seconds and the dentin for 15 seconds using 35% phosphoric acid gel (Ultradent). The acid was then rinsed off, and excess moisture was removed with an air spray. To protect the dentin during air blasting, an absorbent paper was held over it using clinical tweezers, ensuring a whitish appearance for the enamel and slightly moist dentin. Excess water on the cotton roll was dried as well. The BeautiBond Xtreme adhesive system was applied without any waiting time, followed by a gentle air spray for 3 seconds and then a strong air blast to ensure solvent evaporation. Finally, the adhesive was light-cured for 5 seconds using a LED photopolymerizer (Gran Valo LED Curing Light, Ultradent).
- OTHER
-
Group TI and TII - BeautiBond Xtreme (self-etch technique) + Beautifil LS:
no acid etching was performed on either the enamel or dentin. The BeautiBond Xtreme adhesive system was applied immediately, without any waiting time, followed by a gentle air spray for 3 seconds and then a strong air blast to ensure solvent evaporation. The adhesive was then light-cured for 5 seconds using a LED photopolymerizer (Gran Valo LED Curing Light, Ultradent).
- OTHER
-
Group TIII and TIV - BeautiBond Xtreme (selective acid-etch technique) + Beautifil LS
the enamel was etched for 15 seconds using 35% phosphoric acid gel (Ultradent). The acid was then rinsed off, and excess moisture was removed with an air spray, leaving the enamel with a whitish appearance. Excess water on the cotton roll was also dried. Next, the BeautiBond Xtreme adhesive system was applied immediately, without any waiting time, followed by a gentle air spray for 3 seconds and then a strong air blast to ensure solvent evaporation. The adhesive was then light-cured for 5 seconds using a LED photopolymerizer (Gran Valo LED Curing Light, Ultradent).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Sao Paulo
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-10-01
- Completion
- 2024-04-01
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Bioactive Giomer Material Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation
NCT06497231 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Carious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06946134 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction ,Marginal Integrity ,Shade Matching and Gingival Health of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate Bridges Cemented Using Bioactive Cement and Adhesive Resin Cement
NCT03691597 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
E. Max Laminate Veneers With and Without Using Galla Chinnesis as Natural Cross Linking and Remineralizing Agent
NCT02994862 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of High Viscosity Bioactive Injectable Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation
NCT06875544 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Bonded Monolithic Translucent Zirconia Crowns Using Two Different Compositions of Self-adhesive Resin Cements
NCT04875468 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Release of Organic Components of a GIOMER in Non-carious Cervical Lesion Restorations
NCT03637946 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Biodentine Versus Glass Ionomer Cement in Treatment of Very Deep Carious Lesions
NCT02868918 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Injectable Resin Composite Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Cavities Over 18-months.
NCT05389163 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of BIS-GMA Free Dental Resin Composite
NCT05480852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Regeneration in Immature Permanent Human Teeth Using a New Scaffold
NCT06812351 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Effect of Botulinum Toxin a Injection in Treatment of Recession RT1 and RT2
NCT06842290 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Self Assembling Peptide on White Spot Lesion
NCT03930927 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Effect of Different Types of Crowns on Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Assesment
NCT02929173 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Socket Preservation Using Biodentin Versus Xeno Graft for Single Rooted Teeth
NCT06695208 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effect of Thickness Variation in Coronal Plug on Root Maturation and Periapical Healing
NCT07123597 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Indirect Pulp Capping Using Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Deep Carious Molars: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06889363 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation of a New Giomer Restorative System in Class V Restorations
NCT03153969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Types Crowns on Bio Compatibility and Biological Tissue Response
NCT02929199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Microneedling on the Gingival Tissue Surrounding Implant Supported Fixed Restoration.
NCT07294287 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bioflex and Zirconia Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crowns on Primary Molars: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT07156838 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Using Two Different Suturing Techniques on Free Gingival Marginal Stability
NCT04219436 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bulk-fill With Different Technique Three-year Clinical Performance
NCT05861908 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Flowable Composite with Giomer Technology Vs High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations in ART for Cancer Patients
NCT05465369 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Performance of Various Bilayer Biomimetic Resin Composite Strategies
NCT07285772 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA