Parent Satisfaction With Zirconia, Bioflx, and 3D-Printed Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT07672470 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2026-06-29
Summary
This study will compare parent satisfaction with three different types of dental crowns used to restore primary (baby) molars in children: zirconia crowns, Bioflx crowns, and 3D-printed crowns.
Children between 3 and 7 years of age who need a full-coverage restoration of a primary molar will be invited to participate. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the three crown types. All crowns will be placed by the same dentist using standardized treatment procedures.
After treatment, parents will be asked to complete a questionnaire about their satisfaction with the crown. The questionnaire will evaluate several aspects, including the crown's appearance, size, shape, color, durability, and overall satisfaction. Parent satisfaction will be assessed immediately after crown placement and again one month later.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are differences in parent satisfaction among these three crown options. The results may help dentists and families make informed decisions when choosing esthetic full-coverage restorations for primary teeth.
Conditions
- Primary Molar Restoration
- Dental Restorations in Children
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Zirconia crown
Full-coverage prefabricated zirconia crown used for restoration of primary molars in children.
- DEVICE
-
Bioflx crown
Flexible esthetic full-coverage crown used for restoration of primary molars in children.
- DEVICE
-
3D printed crown
Custom made full coverage crown fabricated using digital scanning and 3D printing technology for restoration of primary molars.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Delta University for Science and Technology
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 3 Years
- Max Age
- 7 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-07-01
- Completion
- 2026-07-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
3D-Printed Resin Crowns vs Stainless Steel Crowns in Pulpotomized Primary Molars.
NCT07648979 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Clinical Success of Custom-Made Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Pulpotomized Primary Molars
NCT07738471 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bioflex and Zirconia Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crowns on Primary Molars: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT07156838 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prefabricated CAD/CAM PEEK Crowns For Primary Molars Restoration
NCT07618871 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of BioFlx Crowns and Preformed Zirconia Crowns on Primary Second Molars
NCT06895707 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life for Children With Zirconium Anteroir Crowns Versus Strip Composite Crowns
NCT04973761 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Analysis of Primary Teeth Crown Dimensions and Clinical Evaluation in a Sample of Egyptian Children
NCT06874218 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Molars Restoration Using Different Pediatric Crowns.
NCT04144062 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Digital vs Prefab Crowns for Pulpotomized Primary Molars
NCT06733909 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bioceramic Putty Versus MTA in Pulpotomized Primary Teeth to be Covered With 3D Printed Resin Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crown
NCT07344038 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06856070 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Trial of Two Types of Aesthetics Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06973616 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Prefabricated CAD/CAM PEEK Crowns Used in Primary Molars
NCT06583759 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Crowns Versus Prefabricated Crowns on Primary Teeth
NCT06305845 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bioflex Crowns Endocrowns Compared to Ready-Made Zirconia Crowns on Pulpotomized Primary Molars
NCT06433141 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes and Satisfaction of Stainless Steel vs Bioflx Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT07357402 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Zirconia Crowns and Endocrowns in Pulpotomized Primary Molars
NCT04073901 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Crowns Versus Prefabricated Stainless-Steel Crowns for Intermediate Restoration of Compromised First Permanent Molars
NCT06047925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Stainless-Steel, Zirconia and Fiberglass Crowns for Deciduous Molars
NCT06003257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Acceptance of Bioflx Crowns
NCT06677983 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of a 3D Printed Space Maintainer Versus the Conventional Band and Loop
NCT07161076 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Convenience of Four Types of Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06456879 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Bioactive Composites vs RMGI for Proximal Cavities in Primary Molars
NCT07561216 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of BioFlx, Zirconia, and Stainless-Steel Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06450093 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Resin Composite Restoration of Primary Anterior Teeth Using Custom 3D Printed Templates
NCT06478004 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA