MedTrace Logo

Efficiency of Ozonated Water Arthrocentesis Versus Conventional Arthrocentesis in the Treatment of Anterior Disc Displacement With Reduction of the TMJ

NCT07666282 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2026-06-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ozonized water arthrocentesis (lavage) and conventional Ringer's solution arthrocentesis in the management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) anterior disc displacement with reduction. The study seeks to determine whether the use of ozonized water as an irrigating solution during arthrocentesis provides superior clinical outcomes in terms of pain reduction, improvement of mandibular function, and enhancement of mouth opening compared with conventional arthrocentesis performed using Ringer's solution.

Conditions

  • Ozonated Water Arthrocentesis
  • Conventional Arthrocentesis
  • Anterior Disc Displacement
  • Temporomandibular Joint

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Arthrocentesis using ozonized water

Patients were treated by Arthrocentesis using ozonized water.

PROCEDURE

Arthrocentesis using ringer's solution

Patients were treated using conventional arthrocentesis with ringer's solution.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ain Shams University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-11-11
Primary Completion
2025-11-03
Completion
2025-11-03

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07666282 on ClinicalTrials.gov