Surgical Treatment of Adjacent Segment Stenosis
NCT07661199 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 338
Last updated 2026-06-22
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether microdecompression alone is as effective as decompression with extension of fusion surgery in patients with symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis after previous lumbar fusion surgery.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is microdecompression alone non-inferior to decompression with extension of fusion in improving disability 24 months after surgery, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)? Does microdecompression alone result in similar or lower rates of complications, reoperations, pain, and radiological progression compared with decompression and fusion?
Researchers will compare microdecompression alone to decompression with extension of lumbar fusion to determine whether the less invasive procedure can achieve similar clinical outcomes while reducing surgical burden and preserving spinal structures.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: microdecompression alone or decompression with extension of lumbar fusion.
Undergo the assigned surgical treatment. Attend clinical and radiological follow-up visits at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.
Complete questionnaires assessing disability, pain, quality of life, sleep quality, and mental health.
Undergo routine imaging and clinical examinations to evaluate treatment outcomes and possible complications.
Conditions
- Adjacent Segment Disease
- Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Microsurgical Decompression with Extension of Fusion
Participants undergo microsurgical decompression of symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis combined with extension of the existing lumbar fusion.
- PROCEDURE
-
Microsurgical Decompression Alone
Participants undergo microsurgical decompression of symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis after previous lumbar fusion surgery without extension of the existing fusion.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2030-09-30
- Completion
- 2031-03-01
Countries
- Germany
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Decompression vs. Fusion for Stable Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT02348645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Spinal Stenosis
NCT00000409 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Instr. vs. Non-instr. Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Listhesis
NCT04166981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Surgical Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03365401 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Necessity of Fusion Following Decompression Surgery in Patients With Single-level Lumbar Stenosis
NCT05273879 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3rd-year Post-surgical Evaluation of Adjacent Segment Disc Degeneration Onset in Lumbar Spine (Spinal Fusion vs. Lumbar Arthroplasty With Disc Replacement)
NCT05561322 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Traditional Open Surgery In The Treatment Of Single Level Lumbar Stenosis
NCT04408846 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between The Results of Open and Microsurgical Decompression in Degenerative Spinal Canal Stenosis in Lumbar Spine
NCT06722859 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
MIS-D Versus MIS-TLIF for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT04318795 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Spinal Stenosis
NCT00022776 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Improvement of Low Back Pain After Decompression in Patients with Degenerative Spinal Canal Stenosis
NCT05791422 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Adjacent Segment Disease After Anterior Cervical Decompression Surgery
NCT04320043 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
CSS-Assessing the Course of Degenerative Cervical Spinal Stenosis Using Functional Outcomes
NCT04381663 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
The Synergy Disc To Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
NCT04469231 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Level of Activity in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Pre- and Post-surgery
NCT02154191 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis; Micro-decompression vs Decompression + Instrumented Fusion; Long Term Follow up
NCT03469791 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion by Zero Profile Anchored Cage for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT07743801 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Indirect vs. Direct Decompression for Treatment of Central Stenosis: RCT
NCT04708977 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study
NCT01994512 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Treatment Modalities
NCT06686407 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Follow up Patients With Thoracolumbar Spondylodiscitis Surgically Treated by Posterior Approach
NCT04749082 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Effect of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis on the Clinical Outcome of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Study Protocol
NCT06394089 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Guided Laminectomy With Augmented Duroplasty for Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
NCT07733401 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Stand-Alone Cage Verus Anterior Plating for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
NCT03312192 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Decompression Versus Decompression and Fusion
NCT04542720 ·Status: RECRUITING