Decompression Versus Decompression and Fusion
NCT04542720 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 96
Last updated 2025-11-21
Summary
Adjacent segment disease (ASD) in the lumbar spine is a well-known sequela of lumbar fusion surgery. The annual incidence of adjacent level re-operation is approximately 3% with a ten-year prevalence of 20-30%. Frequently, the surgical treatment involves decompression of the adjacent level coupled with extension of the instrumentation and fusion. Advocates of this paradigm cite the altered kinematics and biomechanics of levels adjacent to a lumbar fusion mass. Furthermore, decompressed levels adjacent to a fused segments are associated with higher rates of ASD in retrospective studies. Yet, a retrospective review of higher quality data concluded decompression adjacent to single-level fusion provides similar outcomes compared to fusions extending across the decompressed segments.
Given the conflicting data currently available, higher quality data are needed to guide surgical decision-making in ASD. The purpose of this trial is to prospectively compare decompression and decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar ASD.
Conditions
- Adjacent Segment Disease
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Observational: Decompression
Patients will undergo decompression alone of the supradjacent level. The surgical technique will be surgeon dependent. All surgeons will be encouraged to avoid damaging facet joints above the fusion mass, retaining 50% of the pars of the decompressed level and performing as minimal of a medial facetectomy as necessary.
- PROCEDURE
-
Observational: Extension Fusion
Patients will undergo decompression and extension of posterior instrumentation and fusion. This may or may not include exchange of pre-existing instrumentation. The use of interbody cages will be left to the discretion of the treating surgeon. The purpose of introducing this heterogeneity is to increase the generalizability of the trial results. The fusion cohort will not utilize bone morphogenetic protein products.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Massachusetts General Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Daniel Tobert, MD · Massachusetts General Hospital
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-09-30
- Completion
- 2027-09-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis; Micro-decompression vs Decompression + Instrumented Fusion; Long Term Follow up
NCT03469791 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Risk Factors of Second Surgery for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
NCT03826329 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Follow up Patients With Thoracolumbar Spondylodiscitis Surgically Treated by Posterior Approach
NCT04749082 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Spinal Approach for Lumbar Active Discopathy
NCT04086199 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Minimally Invasive Decompression and Fusion Versus Open for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis
NCT04594980 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Interbody vs Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion Following Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT01921530 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Dynamic Stabilization Versus Lumbar Fusion in Treatment of Multilevel Lumbar Disc Degeneration Disease
NCT02385695 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
INDEPENDENCE Spacer for Lumbar Fusion
NCT02299323 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Role of Steroids and 10% Hypertonic Sodium Chloride in Adhesiolysis in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome Patients
NCT01053572 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Necessity of Fusion Following Decompression Surgery in Patients With Single-level Lumbar Stenosis
NCT05273879 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03548441 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Decompression vs. Fusion for Stable Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT02348645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Of Drainage Techniques After One- Or Two-Level Open Posterior Lumbar Decompression Or Decompression And Fusion
NCT06820736 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment Comparison for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT00444405 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Revision Surgery of Lumbar Adjacent Segment Degeneration
NCT04970862 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Complication Rates Between Initial and Re-operative Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: Is There a Difference?
NCT05945550 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation
NCT02110186 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
NCT01045473 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Full-Endoscopic vs Open Discectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Herniated Disc
NCT02441959 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Reoperations After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery
NCT06407063 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Patient Positioning in Lumbar Fusion Surgery and Its Impact on Spinal Sagittal Balance and Surgeon Satisfaction
NCT01326091 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Restoring Segmental Lumbar Lordosis After Failed Previous Fusion at the Same Level
NCT07050290 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Pre-existing Adjacent Segment Degeneration on Long-term Effectiveness After Lumbar Fusion Surgery
NCT04467944 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Impact of Epidural Fat Resection on Postoperative Outcomes in Posterior Surgery of Lumbar Spine
NCT02127008 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion
NCT02417272 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA