Micro-osteoperforation Versus Photobiomodulation Therapy for Accelerating Maxillary Canine Retraction
NCT07658235 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 75
Last updated 2026-06-18
Summary
Orthodontic treatment often requires moving the upper canine teeth (the pointed teeth) into the spaces left after removing premolar teeth. This process is usually slow and can take many months, making the total treatment time longer.This study will compare two techniques that may speed up this tooth movement:
Micro-osteoperforation (MOP): A minimally invasive procedure in which a small device is used to create tiny holes in the jawbone near the canine tooth under local anesthesia. These micro-perforations stimulate the bone to remodel faster, which allows the tooth to move more quickly.
Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) / Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT): A painless, non-invasive technique that uses a low-power laser light applied to the gum tissue near the canine tooth. The laser energy stimulates cells in the bone and supporting tissues to accelerate tooth movement without any cutting or drilling.
This trial will randomly assign eligible patients into one of three groups: MOP, LLLT, or a control group receiving standard orthodontic treatment only. Each group will contain 25 participants (75 total). The main goal is to measure and compare how fast the upper canine tooth moves in each group over the first month and until the space is fully closed. The study will also measure the effect of age and sex on the results. The findings will help orthodontists choose the best, fastest, and most comfortable method for each patient to shorten overall treatment time
Conditions
- Malocclusion
- Orthodontic Tooth Movement
- Maxillary Canine Retraction
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Micro-osteoperforation (MOP)
Six micro-osteoperforations of 3 mm depth are created under local anesthesia (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine) using a PROPEL device or equivalent, with 3 perforations placed mesial and 3 distal to each maxillary canine on the buccal attached gingiva. The procedure is performed at baseline and repeated every 4 weeks until complete extraction space closure. All participants also receive standardized canine retraction using 150 g elastomeric power chain force on 0.019×0.025-inch stainless steel archwires
- DEVICE
-
Photobiomodulation Therapy using 976 nm Diode Laser
A 976 nm diode laser (Woodpecker LX16 Plus or equivalent) is applied in continuous-wave mode at a power of 0.13 W and energy density of 8 J/cm² per point. Irradiation is delivered at 6 mucosal sites per canine (3 buccal, 3 palatal) with the laser tip held perpendicular to the tissue surface at each point. Sessions are performed on days 0, 3, 7, and 14 after each activation, then every 2 weeks until complete extraction space closure. No anesthesia is required. All participants also receive standardized canine retraction using 150 g elastomeric power chain force on 0.019×0.025-inch stainless steel archwires
- OTHER
-
Conventional orthodontic canine retraction
Standard bilateral maxillary canine retraction is performed using a standardized elastomeric power chain force of 150 g on 0.019×0.025-inch stainless steel archwires. Force is recalibrated at each monthly appointment. No adjunctive biological or physical intervention is applied. This arm serves as the active comparator to quantify the absolute acceleration produced by MOP and LLLT relative to conventional mechanics alone.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Kufa University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-03-28
- Completion
- 2027-05-28
Countries
- Iraq
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Corticotomy and Micro-Osteoperforation During Canine Retraction
NCT04999150 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) During Orthodontic Canine Retraction
NCT04868721 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Low-level Laser Irradiation Protocols on the Rate of Canine Retraction
NCT04926389 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Injectable PRF Vs LLL on Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT06520761 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flapless Mops for Acceleration of Canine Retraction
NCT04383600 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LLLLT vs Piezocision in Accelerating Orthodontic Canine Retraction
NCT07466641 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of the Photobiomodulation Applications
NCT04022252 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Bone Dehiscence and Fenestration Following Accelerated Maxillary Canine Retraction
NCT06500559 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Micro-osteoperforation on Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction
NCT03764189 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of the Efficacy of Microosteoperforations Versus Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin During Orthodontic Leveling and Alignment of Mandibular Incisors
NCT06498609 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Extraoral Photobiomodulation on the Rate of Orthodontic Alignment
NCT02267824 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Multiple Injections of (PRF) on The Rate of Canine Retraction
NCT05766618 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Assessment of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Self-ligating Brackets System Assisted With Micro-osteoperforations
NCT05595174 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of PBM on Fixed-appliance Orthodontic Patients
NCT06199674 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Low-level Laser Therapy Versus Low-intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Different Orthodontic Tooth Movements
NCT06026930 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Micro-osteoperforations to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT05281588 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Mini Implant Facilitated Micro-osteoperforations on the Alignment of Mandibular Anterior Crowding
NCT04778241 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Photobiomodulation and Root Resorption
NCT04044989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Evaluation Of The Efficiency Of Micro-osteoperforation
NCT03652454 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Low-Level Laser Therapy and Flapless Corticopuncture Effect on Accelerating Six Maxillary Anterior Teeth Retraction
NCT03999307 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Facilitated by Micro-osteoperforation in Adolescent Patients With Skeletal Maxillary Constriction
NCT03772379 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Micro-osteoperforations and Tooth Movement
NCT02473471 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Maxillary Canine Retraction Assisted With Two Different Methods of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound
NCT05692817 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort and Periodontal Status Between Two Acceleration Methods of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction
NCT05656898 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA