MedTrace Logo

Dry-Shield vs Rubber Dam During Fissure Sealant Placement

NCT07622173 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2026-06-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficiency of the Dry-Shield isolation system compared with rubber dam isolation and cotton roll isolation during fissure sealant application in permanent molars among pediatric patients.

The study evaluates chairside time, patient preference, and fissure sealant retention rates after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Proper isolation during fissure sealant application is considered essential for optimal retention and long-term clinical success.

The study also aims to assess whether Dry-Shield can provide a practical and comfortable alternative to conventional isolation techniques in pediatric dentistry.

Conditions

  • Pit and Fissure Sealants
  • Dental Caries Prevention

Interventions

OTHER

Pit and fissure sealant (Conseal F)

Application of a fluoride-releasing, resin-based pit and fissure sealant (Conseal F) on eligible permanent molars to evaluate and compare the clinical efficiency of three different isolation methods.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Suez Canal University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
6 Years
Max Age
15 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-02-26
Primary Completion
2026-04-29
Completion
2026-05-08

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07622173 on ClinicalTrials.gov