Manual Arthroplasty Versus VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution Functional Alignment Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT07551856 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 346
Last updated 2026-05-04
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution (VRAS) device helps to improve outcomes from total knee replacement, when compared to regular non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement in the treatment of osteoarthritis. It will also aim to review the longer-term safety and efficiency effects of using this device.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Does VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement improve patient outcomes (such as their function, satisfaction, and pain) when compared to non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement?
2. Does VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement improve clinical outcomes (such as revision risk, complications, and hospital length of stay) when compared to non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement?
3. Does VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement improve functional outcomes (including biomechanical motion analysis) when compared to non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement?
4. What are the economic and efficiency effects of VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement compared to non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement?
5. What are the human factor and learning curve effects of introducing VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement into healthcare teams?
6. Are there any differences in safety and adverse event incidence between VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement and non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement?
Participants will:
* Be randomised to receive a total knee replacement using either regular non-robotic-assisted methods, or with the use of the VRAS device.
* Be assessed pre-operatively at the clinic, and then at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months following date of operation. At these appointments patients will answer questionnaires, receive an x-ray (pre-operatively, and at 6 months post-operatively), and a subgroup will be reviewed in the motion analysis laboratory (pre-operatively, and at 6 months post-operatively).
* Have their longer-term outcomes including any revision operations monitored out to 10 years through national registry data linkage (no actual follow-up for patients after 12 months).
Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Osteoarthritis (Knee)
- Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
- Osteo Arthritis
- Osteoarthritis (OA)
- Osteoarthritis
- Osteoarthritis in the Knee
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Robot-Assisted Functionally Aligned Total Knee Replacement
This device is a semi-active image-free arthroplasty robot that is under the full control of the surgeon at all times, but helps to make certain parts of the operation more accurate (bone cuts). The device will allow for use of so-called functional alignment. The implant put into the knee (ATTUNE total knee replacement) is the same for either of the techniques used (traditional method or VELYS robot). It has an excellent track record and is widely used in the UK and throughout the world.
- PROCEDURE
-
Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty
This will be a manual total knee replacement carried out in standard fashion using ATTUNE implants with a good UK and worldwide track record. Alignment philosophies used will be manually achievable.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator INDUSTRY
-
DePuy Orthopaedics
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Jon V Clarke, PhD, FRCS (Tr & Orth) · Golden Jubilee University National Hospital
-
Nick D Clement, MD, PhD, FRCS (Tr & Orth) · Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
-
Andrew J Hall, PhD, MBChB, MRCS (Ed.) · University of St Andrews
-
Joanne McGarry · Golden Jubilee University National Hospital
-
Christopher Gee, MSc, FRCS (Tr & Orth), MFSTEd · Golden Jubilee University National Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-08
- Primary Completion
- 2029-10-30
- Completion
- 2030-05-08
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Functionally Aligned vs Mechanical Axis Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04748510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assisted vs Custom Made Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06280352 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty in Varus Deformity
NCT07465484 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Study to Evaluate Robot Assisted Total Knee Replacement Outcomes
NCT03523897 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07212296 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Outcomes Following Kinematic and Functional Alignment in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty With Randomized Insert Types
NCT07533188 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ROSA Robot Used in Total Knee Replacement Post Market Study
NCT03969654 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mako Functionally Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Mako Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04092153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orthosensor vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03628378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does an Active Range of Motion Monitor Improve Outcomes/Decrease Cost for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty?
NCT05310474 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Navigation-assisted OrthoPilot® Elite and Robotic-assisted MAKO® Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05980442 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Imageless Navigation Versus Image-Based Navigation in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT07522489 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Economic Comparison of Robot Assisted Versus Manual Knee Replacement
NCT01705886 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic-assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04982198 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) After Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Under Spinal Anesthesia
NCT03053453 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Visionaire™ Versus Standard Instrumentation Safety and Efficacy in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
NCT01084772 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Balancing Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Replacements During Total Primary Knee Arthroplasty Using Verasense
NCT03286868 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Using a Smart Implantable Device to Compare Early Recovery in Two Different Knee Arthroplasty Approaches
NCT07348835 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
An Artificial Intelligence-based Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty: From Inflammatory Responses to Personalized Medicine
NCT06634654 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Instrumentation, Computer Navigation, and Robotic Assistance Techniques in TKA
NCT05629715 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic-Arm Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03668717 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Cruciate-Retaining Versus Bi-Cruciate Stabilized
NCT06838663 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Multi-Center Study on the Clinical Advantages of Personalized Total Knee Arthroplasty System
NCT07003035 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Total Versus Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
NCT05290818 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assisted Surgery In Total Knee Replacement
NCT05842538 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA