Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Longitudinal vs. Transverse A1 Pulley Release
NCT07516652 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2026-04-08
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different skin incisions used in surgery to treat trigger finger in adult patients. Trigger finger occurs when a finger gets stuck or locks because of swelling of the sheath around the tendons the help move the fingers. The main questions it aims to answer are (1) Does the type of skin cut affect how well the hand works 6 weeks after surgery? (2) Does the type of skin cut affect pain levels, scar healing, and how quickly people return to their normal activities? Orthopaedic surgeons will compare a straight incision along the finger (longitudinal incision) to a incision across the crease in the palm (transverse incision) to see if one type of incision results in better recovery, less pain, a better scar, and higher patient satisfaction with the procedure. Participants who have trigger finger and are indicated for surgery will have surgery to release the pulley in their finger using one of the two types of incisions (assigned by chance). Participants will fill out questionnaires about their hand function and pain before surgery and at follow-up visits. Participants will have their scar checked and rated at about 2, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery, and report on their pain for the first few days after surgery and when they can return to work and move their finger without pain.
Conditions
- Trigger Finger
- Stenosing Tenosynovitis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Open A1 Pulley Release
Surgical release of the first annular (A1) pulley to treat stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger). Participants receive either a longitudinal or transverse incision based on their randomized arm assignment. All other aspects of surgical technique and post-operative care are standardized.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Chicago
collaborator OTHER -
Washington University School of Medicine
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jason Strelzow, MD · Associate Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery Division of Hand and Microsurgery, Washington University in St Louis
-
Ryan Calfee, MD · Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery Division of Hand and Microsurgery Chief, Hand and Microsurgery Service Medical Director, Washington University and Barnes-Jewish Orthopedic Center
-
Nisha N Kale, MD · Washington University in St. Louis Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-04-01
- Completion
- 2028-03-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Study of Open and Percutaneous Release of Acquired Trigger Thumb
NCT03679793 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trigger Finger Treatment
NCT03847935 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Pulley Release With Infiltration, Versus Infiltration Alone in Trigger Finders
NCT05045157 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Corticosteroid Injection at A1 Pulley in Comparison to Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release as a Treatment for Idiopathic Trigger Finger
NCT05170152 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Open Surgery Versus Corticosteroid Injections in Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT01486420 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Steroid Injection Which is Added to Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release: a Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT01781130 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Release vs Steroid Injection for Trigger Finger
NCT05383040 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Versus Knifelight for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Randomized Control Trial
NCT01756820 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Treatment of Trigger Finger With Steroid Injection Versus Steroid Injection and Splinting
NCT01886157 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy +/- Corticosteroid Injection for Dupuytren's Contracture
NCT05440240 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison Between 2 Treatment Modalities of Trigger Finger: Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Release of A1 Pulley by a Needle Knife Versus Ultrasound-guided Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT06785935 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Concomitant Steroid Injection Versus Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Alone
NCT06288685 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger
NCT06382623 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Flexor Tenosynovectomy to Treat Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT03757416 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
The Effects of a Structured Hand Exercise Program on Trigger Finger: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06911762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Aponeurotomy
NCT03797690 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Release vs. Open Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT07230782 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Prophylactic Limited Palmar Fasciectomy on Surgical Outcomes and Scarring
NCT03155854 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Conservative Interventions in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT06296017 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Natural History of Congenital Trigger Thumbs
NCT01424995 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Function and Scar in Trigger Finger Release
NCT05477290 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Preoperative Serial Casting, Education, and Therapy for Dupuytren's Contracture
NCT07024576 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Corticosteroid vs. Amniotic Fluid Injections in Patients With Trigger Finger
NCT03583151 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Radiation Therapy for Dupuytren's Contracture Following Non-Surgical Release
NCT06330545 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing One Versus Two Cortisone Injections for Trigger Finger
NCT00951236 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA