Percutaneous Release vs Steroid Injection for Trigger Finger
NCT05383040 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 112
Last updated 2023-02-27
Summary
Trigger fingers (TF) is the common cause of pain and disturbed function of hand. Many studies show that percutaneous release of A1 pulley has better outcome than the steroid injection. However, over the past many years, steroid injection has been considered as the choice of treatment after the failure of conservative treatment methods. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of percutaneous release of A1 pulley compared with the local Steroid injection in the treatment of trigger fingers.
This study is based on a randomized clinical trial to compare the effect of the percutaneous release of A1 pulley with steroid injection in trigger fingers. A total of 112 participants aged 18 years and above suffering from trigger fingers with failed conservative treatment will be intervened randomly (56 participants in injection group and 56 participants in percutaneous release group). The Quinnell's classification, VAS scoring system and active range of movement in the affected site will be assessed at the baseline and the same criteria will be at one month and three month as end line assessment. Statistical analyses will be performed using independent t-test and Mann Whitney U test to compare between the two means. The outcome of this study will help to guide the physicians to choose the better therapeutic approach among the patients suffering from trigger fingers.
Conditions
- Trigger Finger
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Percutaneous release
Percutaneous release of A1 pulley release will be performed in the well-managed operation theater set up, using an 18 gauge hypodermic needle, after preparation of the skin and injection of 1ml 2% plain lidocaine. The proper location of the pulley will be defined using surface landmarks in each digit after waiting a few minutes to allow the anesthetic to take effect the 18 gauge needle will be longitudinally moved to keep the level of the needle parallel with the tendon grating sensation will be elucidated confirming the cut of pulley until there is no grating sensation felt and improvement of symptoms. A sterile dressing will be placed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Armed Police Force Hospital, Nepal
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Mandeep Karki, MS · Nepal Orthopedic Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-11-02
- Completion
- 2022-11-02
Countries
- Nepal
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ultrasound Guided Corticosteroid Injection at A1 Pulley in Comparison to Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release as a Treatment for Idiopathic Trigger Finger
NCT05170152 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger
NCT06382623 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Trigger Finger Trial
NCT05251428 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Pulley Release With Infiltration, Versus Infiltration Alone in Trigger Finders
NCT05045157 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Open Surgery Versus Corticosteroid Injections in Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT01486420 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Steroid Injection Which is Added to Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release: a Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT01781130 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Trigger Finger With Steroid Injection Versus Steroid Injection and Splinting
NCT01886157 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Corticosteroid vs. Amniotic Fluid Injections in Patients With Trigger Finger
NCT03583151 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effectiveness of Cortisone Injection and Splinting for Trigger Finger
NCT03156829 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Pull-out Tenolysis Versus Simple A1 Pulley Release in Trigger Digits
NCT06747962 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of a Structured Hand Exercise Program on Trigger Finger: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06911762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) Versus Traditional Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT04855942 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trigger Finger Corticosteroid Injection With and Without Local Anesthetic
NCT04023695 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effectiveness of Platelet-rich Plasma for Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT04167098 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing One Versus Two Cortisone Injections for Trigger Finger
NCT00951236 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Features of Trigger Finger
NCT05675488 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect Of Dry Needling On Quality Of Life In Patients With Trigger Fingers
NCT05671523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intrasynovial Digital Anesthesia in Trigger Finger
NCT06476977 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Platelet Rich Plasma and Steroid Injection in Trigger Finger Treatment
NCT06532318 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Investigation on Safety, Performance and Effectiveness of Sono-instruments
NCT05435950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
IMpact of Perineural Hydrodissection Over Alternative Therapies in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT03616353 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Conservative Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT05837286 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment of Adult Trigger Finger
NCT02196233 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Extracorporeal Shock Wave in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT03928873 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Conservative Interventions in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT06296017 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA