Pull-out Tenolysis Versus Simple A1 Pulley Release in Trigger Digits
NCT06747962 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2025-01-14
Summary
Trigger finger is a common tendinopathy and clinically presents with painful catching or popping as the patient flexes and extends the digit, due to mechanical impingement of the thickened flexor tendons as they pass through a narrow tendon sheath canal at the level of the metacarpal head. If conservative management with corticosteroid injection and splinting fails or if symptoms recur, surgery and division of the A1 pulley are indicated. Traction (or pull- out) tenolysis is a maneuver based on pulling of the flexor tendons out of the wound, to release any adhesions that might have occurred due to long- standing triggering. Although it has been associated with postoperative pain and stiffness, no robust evidence exists to support its benefit or not. In view of the low quality evidence regarding the pros and cons of traction (or pull-out) tenolysis following A1 pulley release, the investigators will compare simple A1 pulley release versus A1 pulley release and pull-out tenolysis in a prospective randomized study design. Hypothesis of the study is that the pull- out tenolysis yields better results in terms of total active range of movement, pinch and grip strength, pain and quick-DASH scoring when compared to simple pulley release. The confirmation of the hypothesis will justify the use of pull-out tenolysis as a means of breaking any tendon adhesions and returning to normal function sooner. On the contrary, if the pull-out tenolysis is linked to a less favorable functional outcome, simple A1 pulley release will be recommended.
Conditions
- Trigger Digit
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
A1 pulley release and pull out tenolysis
A short transverse incision will be made over the proximal or distal palmar crease, according to the digit involved. Blunt dissection will be used to spread the subcutaneous tissue and the palmar fascia to expose the A1 pulley. The digital nerves and vessels will be retracted and protected. The proximal edge of the A1 pulley will be identified and a scalpel blade will be used to divide the entire A1 pulley under direct vision. Flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus tendons or flexor pollicis longus tendon (for the thumb) will be gently pulled out of the wound with two mosquito forceps to break any adhesions. The wound will be closed primarily with sutures. The patient will be asked to actively move the digit to confirm complete relief of triggering.The wound will be closed primarily with sutures.
- PROCEDURE
-
Simple A1 pulley release
A short transverse incision will be made over the proximal or distal palmar crease, according to the digit involved. Blunt dissection will be used to spread the subcutaneous tissue and the palmar fascia to expose the A1 pulley. The digital nerves and vessels will be retracted and protected. The proximal edge of the A1 pulley will be identified and a scalpel blade will be used to divide the entire A1 pulley vision. After release, the patient will be asked to actively move the digit to confirm complete relief of triggering.The wound will be closed primarily with sutures.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Eleni Karagergou
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Panagiotis Givissis, Professor · Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 100 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-31
- Completion
- 2027-01-31
Countries
- Greece
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Concomitant Steroid Injection Versus Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Alone
NCT06288685 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Ultrasound Guided Corticosteroid Injection at A1 Pulley in Comparison to Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release as a Treatment for Idiopathic Trigger Finger
NCT05170152 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between 2 Treatment Modalities of Trigger Finger: Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Release of A1 Pulley by a Needle Knife Versus Ultrasound-guided Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT06785935 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Release vs Steroid Injection for Trigger Finger
NCT05383040 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Steroid Injection Which is Added to Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release: a Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT01781130 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger
NCT06382623 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Clinical Study to Compare Functional Outcomes After Surgery Using a Transverse or Longitudinal Surgical Incision in the Skin.
NCT06267105 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Trigger Finger With Steroid Injection Versus Steroid Injection and Splinting
NCT01886157 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open Surgery Versus Corticosteroid Injections in Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT01486420 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Fascial Manipulation With Traditional Physiotherapy for the Treatment of Trigger Fingers
NCT01987115 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Cortisone Injection and Splinting for Trigger Finger
NCT03156829 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparative Evaluation of Finger Splint, Paraffin, and Peloidotherapy Interventions in the Management of Trigger Finger
NCT07256522 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Metacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking Splint With Relative Motion Extension Splint for Trigger Finger
NCT06137404 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of a Structured Hand Exercise Program on Trigger Finger: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06911762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Versus Knifelight for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Randomized Control Trial
NCT01756820 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effectiveness of Platelet-rich Plasma for Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT04167098 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Non-surgical Interventions for the Trigger Finger: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02972879 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Function and Scar in Trigger Finger Release
NCT05477290 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness of Conservative Interventions in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT06296017 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ESWT vs Orthosis in Trigger Finger
NCT06737601 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness of the Two Splints in Trigger Finger
NCT05942443 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of the Relation Between Trigger Digit and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT04072692 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Relative Motion Splint and Metacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking Splint for Trigger Finger
NCT05763017 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) Versus Traditional Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT04855942 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Needle Knife Release for Trigger Finger
NCT06788860 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA