Conventional Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs for Anterior Open Bite Treatment
NCT07509567 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2026-07-22
Summary
This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness and patient acceptance of two orthodontic appliances-conventional palatal crib and bonded spurs-in the treatment of anterior open bite in children.Twenty children aged 7 to 12 years with anterior open bite and Class I skeletal and dental relationships will be randomly assigned to one of two groups The first group will receive a conventional palatal crib appliance fixed to the upper molars, while the second group will receive bonded spurs attached to the palatal surfaces of the upper incisors , All participants will be followed for 6 months. Clinical and digital measurements, including overbite ,The results of this study are expected to help determine which appliance provides better clinical outcomes and higher patient acceptance in the early treatment of anterior open bite.
Conditions
- Anterior Open Bite
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Conventional Palatal Crib
A fixed orthodontic appliance made of 0.9 mm stainless steel wire with 5-7 loops and an acrylic button covering the base.It is cemented to the maxillary first molars using Ultra band cement and positioned 3-4 mm posterior to the cingula of maxillary incisors to prevent tongue thrusting. Treatment duration is 6 months.
- DEVICE
-
Bonded Spurs
Bonded spurs are placed on the middle third of the palatal surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular incisors. They correct anterior open bite by preventing the tongue from contacting the upper and lower anterior teeth and reminding the patient to maintain proper tongue position. Treatment duration is 6 months.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Dr. Ahmed El-Bialy, Professor, Department of Ortho · Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 7 Years
- Max Age
- 12 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-07-20
- Primary Completion
- 2026-08-01
- Completion
- 2026-10-01
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Maxillary Posterior Teeth Intrusion by Skeletally Anchored Mousetrap Appliance in Adult Patient With Anterior Open Bite.
NCT06757686 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Correction of Anterior Open Bite With Skeletally Anchored Extrusion Arch
NCT05492864 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Miniscrew Anchored Maxillary Protraction Protocols
NCT03712007 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Palatal Versus Buccal Protraction Using Plates Assisted With Facemask in Growing Class III Patients
NCT06452368 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Anterior Cross Bite Treatment on Children's Speech Performance
NCT06168695 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Mini-screw Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion on Midpalatal Suture in Post-pubertal Patients: a CBCT Study
NCT07075211 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion With Digital Bonded Reverse Twin Block in Mixed Dentition
NCT07376954 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Evaluation Treatment Outcomes of Anterior Open Bite Treated by Temporary Anchorage Devices
NCT06147739 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Twin Block Appliance in Incremental Versus Maximum Bite Advancement in Skeletal Class II
NCT04562545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Orthopedic Mandibular Advancement in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion on Pharyngeal Airway
NCT04255511 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Occlusal Bite Force Changes After Surgical Correction of the Increased Vertical Dimension
NCT04376645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II
NCT06631235 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Skeletal Open Bite With Open Bite Activator and Skeletal Anchorage-Supported Vertical Elastics
NCT06936371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Maxillary Protraction Using Tooth-borne Facemask Versus Skeletal Anchorage Chin-plate in Class III Growing Patients
NCT07383259 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Skeletal Anchored Versus Incisal Capped Twin Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion
NCT06209086 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Anterior Open Bite Closure by Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in Adult Patients With Skeletal Open Bite: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT07117006 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Miniscrew-assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion With and Without Corticopuncture
NCT05543460 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Different Anchorage-supported Appliances and Expansion Procedures for Face Mask Treatment
NCT06244563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bonded Bite Turbos Were Bonded to Palatal Surfaces of Maxillary Incisors for Sixty Patients With Anterior Deep Overbite to Check Acceptance Rate of Patients to These Bite Turbos.
NCT07143916 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Upper Airway's Pressure Drop Analyses After Mandibular Advancement and Maxillary Expansion
NCT04190953 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Dentoalveolar Changes of Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliances on Skeletal Class I Non-extraction Patients With Dental Crowding
NCT07090746 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
MARPE in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
NCT04354116 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Rates of Activation of Miniscrew-Supported Upper Jaw Expander in Adolescents
NCT04225637 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Conventional Versus Skeletally Anchored Facemask in Treatment of the Prepubertal Skeletal Class III Patients
NCT05089396 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treating Gnathic Form of Mesial Occlusion in Early Adolescence Patients
NCT05173402 ·Status: COMPLETED